Ballot Type: Human
Submitted: Aug. 12, 2024, 1:50 p.m.
Overall Rationale: Did this last year as well, but what I try to do in the preseason is create a ranking based on recruiting and prior year performance. I got the data from collegefootballdata.com and ESPN and messed around with the weighting until I got a result that made sense to me. This isn't something i'll base my polls off of going forward throughout the season, I only do this for the preaseason polls and do a true human poll for the regular season. Factors used: Recruiting Factor - Weighted 40% of total, meant to be a factor showing overall roster talent (didn't account for transfers out/early leavers for the draft because I have no clue how to do that) Factors within recruiting - 24/7 Composite total - 75% of Recruiting Total - Pulled the composite numbers for 2024 (20%), 2023 (32.5%), 2022 (30%), and 2021 (17.5%). I weighted the importance of recruiting years based on how I feel that each year would impact the current year - 24/7 Rankings - 25% of Recruiting Total - Same as above, just the rankings instead of composite; Composite Poll Factor - Weighted 25% of total - Meant to be a factor bringing in prior year performance and valuing those who had a good year last year - Final AP Poll - 75% of poll factor - This is only the top 25 plus receiving votes (in votes received order, ended up with around 46 numbered teams total) of the prior year, anyone not in this was numbered 55 to not skew these rankings - Final S&P+ rankings - 25% of poll factor - This is a full ranking of the top 130ish teams - thought this would be helpful to add because it actually ranks all teams not just 25; Production Factor - Weighted 35% of total - Meant to be a factor weighing returning production/starters. This is based on Bill Connley's article on returning production - this is from February so it's highly possible that it's outdated, but i'm not sure if there's a more recent one. You can read his article for the methodology he takes https://www.espn.com/college-football/insider/story/_/id/39436455/college-football-2024-returning-production-rankings-134-teams -Weighted Offense Factor - 50% of production factor, made up of following - Returning offense production - 60% of weighted offense - Offense unit rank - 40% of weighted offense - based on the S&P+ offense ranks - Weighted Defense Factor - 50% of production factor, made up of following - Returning defense production - 60% of weighted defense - Defense unit rank - 40% of weighted defense - based on the S&P+ defense ranks I'll put the weighted ranking of each team below in my "reasons" as well
Rank | Team | Reason |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
Recruiting Rank #4 Poll Rank #3 Production Rank #2 Overall Weighted Number 3.05 - Could see an argument for Georgia here too, but the returning production Texas has a QB pushed them over the top here I think. |
2 |
![]() |
Recruiting Rank #2 Poll Rank #2 Production Rank #9 Overall Weighted Number 4.45 - As I said above, could make an argument for Georgia #1 as well, but either way it's clear they're not out of the top 2. |
3 |
![]() |
Recruiting Rank #10 Poll Rank #5 Production Rank #5 Overall Weighted Number 7 - They lose Bo Nix but replace him with Dillon Gabriel, along with a strong recent recruiting record. This should be a good team this year |
4 |
![]() |
Recruiting Rank #12 Poll Rank #10 Production Rank #6 Overall Weighted Number 9.4 |
5 |
![]() |
Recruiting Rank #7 Poll Rank #11 Production Rank #21 Overall Weighted Number 12.9 |
6 |
![]() |
Recruiting Rank #21 Poll Rank #9 Production Rank #7 Overall Weighted Number 13.1 |
7 |
![]() |
Recruiting Rank #5 Poll Rank #42 Production Rank #3 Overall Weighted Number 13.55 |
8 |
![]() |
Recruiting Rank #3 Poll Rank #80 Production Rank #3 Overall Weighted Number 13.7 |
9 |
![]() |
Recruiting Rank #8 Poll Rank #12 Production Rank #24 Overall Weighted Number 14.6 |
10 |
![]() |
Recruiting Rank #6 Poll Rank #14 Production Rank #25 Overall Weighted Number 14.65 |
11 |
![]() |
Recruiting Rank #9 Poll Rank #17 Production Rank #37 Overall Weighted Number 20.8 |
12 |
![]() |
Recruiting Rank #18 Poll Rank #7 Production Rank #36 Overall Weighted Number 21.55 |
13 |
![]() |
Recruiting Rank #29 Poll Rank #31 Production Rank #10 Overall Weighted Number 22.85 |
14 |
![]() |
Recruiting Rank #39 Poll Rank #19 Production Rank #8 Overall Weighted Number 23.15 |
15 |
![]() |
Recruiting Rank #14 Poll Rank #53 Production Rank #17 Overall Weighted Number 24.8 |
16 |
![]() |
Recruiting Rank #1 Poll Rank #6 Production Rank #71 Overall Weighted Number 26.75. Note that the coaching change isn't factored in here. |
17 |
![]() |
Recruiting Rank #45 Poll Rank #13 Production Rank #16 Overall Weighted Number 26.85 |
18 |
![]() |
Recruiting Rank #15 Poll Rank #15 Production Rank #49 Overall Weighted Number 26.9 |
19 |
![]() |
Recruiting Rank #11 Poll Rank #44 Production Rank #33 Overall Weighted Number 26.95 |
20 |
![]() |
Recruiting Rank #20 Poll Rank #41 Production Rank #26 Overall Weighted Number 27.35 |
21 |
![]() |
Recruiting Rank #32 Poll Rank #45 Production Rank #13 Overall Weighted Number 28.6 |
22 |
![]() |
Recruiting Rank #35 Poll Rank #56 Production Rank #4 Overall Weighted Number 29.4 |
23 |
![]() |
Recruiting Rank #36 Poll Rank #28 Production Rank #83 Overall Weighted Number 29.45 |
24 |
![]() |
Recruiting Rank #44 Poll Rank #51 Production Rank #1 Overall Weighted Number 30.85 - Note, TCU was in this spot, but I removed them as I didn't feel that Michigan should be outside the top 25. I didn't change the ordering of any other teams in my top 25. |
25 |
![]() |
Recruiting Rank #13 Poll Rank #1 Production Rank #83 Overall Weighted Number 34.5 - As mentioned for 24, Michigan was actually outside of my top 25 when I performed this exercise. I didn't want to dilute Michigan's potential rating in the preseason poll and didn't feel it was appropriate to not include the defending national champions (despite the coaching change and other factors). The following teams would have been ahead of Michigan - TCU Overall weighted number 29.8, Nebraska 30.85, Louisville 32.65, Iowa 32.75, and Auburn 33.4 |
Teams Ranked:
Rank | Team | Unusualness |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
0.41 |
2 |
![]() |
0.00 |
3 |
![]() |
0.00 |
4 |
![]() |
0.70 |
5 |
![]() |
1.59 |
6 |
![]() |
0.72 |
7 |
![]() |
2.97 |
8 |
![]() |
-1.60 |
9 |
![]() |
0.00 |
10 |
![]() |
0.76 |
11 |
![]() |
0.33 |
12 |
![]() |
0.00 |
13 |
![]() |
0.00 |
14 |
![]() |
0.27 |
15 |
![]() |
9.71 |
16 |
![]() |
-2.56 |
17 |
![]() |
0.30 |
18 |
![]() |
0.00 |
19 |
![]() |
0.00 |
20 |
![]() |
-2.84 |
21 |
![]() |
3.85 |
22 |
![]() |
2.16 |
23 |
![]() |
1.87 |
24 |
![]() |
0.96 |
25 |
![]() |
-2.85 |
Omissions:
Team | Unusualness |
---|---|
![]() |
1.46 |
![]() |
0.45 |
![]() |
0.30 |
![]() |
0.22 |
![]() |
0.21 |
Total Score: 39.09