Ballot Type: Human
Submitted: Oct. 11, 2020, 12:30 a.m.
Rank | Team | Reason |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
Tigers are rolling. Ranked over Bama since they have their defense issues figured out.  |
2 |
![]() |
Welp that was shoot out. Let's see how next week goes against a tough UGA defense |
3 |
![]() |
Great job by the defense to force 3 turnovers and pull away from a good Tennessee team |
4 |
![]() |
Considering the whole defense was in quarantine, this was a good outing. Run game was phenomenal, and the passing game was better but left more to be desired. I expect a USF type performance against Louisville next week. |
5 |
![]() |
Offense did well against a team that lost half it's defense, but this team seems legit.  |
6 |
![]() |
Knew I wasn't crazy for keeping A&M so high last week. Mond might be coming into his own form.  |
7 |
![]() |
Off this week. |
8 |
![]() |
Struggled, but good teams win all types of games |
9 |
![]() |
Defense has issues that need to be fixed, but this is a solid squad |
10 |
![]() |
Refs gave them the game, but it's sometimes better to be lucky than good |
11 |
![]() |
Great game against TT. Cyclones might win the Big 12 |
12 |
![]() |
Strong performance as well. Are KSU and ISU the new Texas and OU? |
13 |
![]() |
Off |
14 |
![]() |
Well, this shows that Miami still has a ways to go with competing with the big dogs.  |
15 |
![]() |
That ISU win is looking better day by day |
16 |
![]() |
Ugly win, but option teams always have something special |
17 |
![]() |
Off |
18 |
![]() |
Off |
19 |
![]() |
Won on a fluke, but they got a legit team with a legit QB.  |
20 |
![]() |
One game, but they did pretty well.  |
21 |
![]() |
Offense needs to get better. The defense can keep them competitive against Bama, but they need to run the ball better |
22 |
![]() |
Haven't seen these teams play (22-25) but they all have winning records, which puts them above a lot of teams |
23 |
![]() |
Haven't seen these teams play (22-25) but they all have winning records, which puts them above a lot of teams |
24 |
![]() |
Haven't seen these teams play (22-25) but they all have winning records, which puts them above a lot of teams |
25 |
![]() |
Haven't seen these teams play (22-25) but they all have winning records, which puts them above a lot of teams |
Teams Ranked:
Rank | Team | Unusualness |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
0.00 |
2 |
![]() |
0.00 |
3 |
![]() |
0.00 |
4 |
![]() |
0.00 |
5 |
![]() |
0.00 |
6 |
![]() |
0.81 |
7 |
![]() |
0.00 |
8 |
![]() |
0.32 |
9 |
![]() |
0.22 |
10 |
![]() |
0.99 |
11 |
![]() |
1.03 |
12 |
![]() |
1.39 |
13 |
![]() |
0.00 |
14 |
![]() |
0.00 |
15 |
![]() |
0.00 |
16 |
![]() |
6.33 |
17 |
![]() |
0.00 |
18 |
![]() |
2.98 |
19 |
![]() |
1.65 |
20 |
![]() |
4.14 |
21 |
![]() |
0.00 |
22 |
![]() |
0.95 |
23 |
![]() |
0.00 |
24 |
![]() |
1.08 |
25 |
![]() |
0.00 |
Omissions:
Team | Unusualness |
---|---|
![]() |
1.37 |
![]() |
1.21 |
![]() |
0.87 |
![]() |
0.68 |
![]() |
0.41 |
![]() |
0.35 |
![]() |
0.08 |
Total Score: 26.85