Ballot Type: Computer
Submitted: Sept. 29, 2019, 4:08 p.m.
Overall Rationale: Average Transitive Margin of Victory - relies on score differential and nothing else, not even who won, and constructs a power ranking based on head to head matchups. Much more detail at:https://www.reddit.com/r/CFBAnalysis/comments/db0tn8/average_transitive_margin_of_victory_rankings/
Rank | Team | Reason |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
Literally unstoppable against average and above average teams. |
2 |
![]() |
Maryland skews them up here, would be 6th if the Maryland-Syracuse game is excluded |
3 |
![]() |
Played some above average to good teams and won. |
4 |
![]() |
Demolished below-average teams, finally beat a good team. |
5 |
![]() |
|
6 |
![]() |
Early season cupcake munching and hung/beat with some good teams. |
7 |
![]() |
|
8 |
![]() |
|
9 |
![]() |
|
10 |
![]() |
|
11 |
![]() |
|
12 |
![]() |
|
13 |
![]() |
Big wins and a close Top-11 loss. |
14 |
![]() |
|
15 |
![]() |
52 point victory against ULM is a huge boost to their power, should be averaged out soon as ULM plays Memphis and Iowa State plays another game to average out a single game's effect on the power. |
16 |
![]() |
All their opponents got a power boost this week. Medium-sized wins over above-average teams and a close loss to a top 25 team. Model predicts a 35 point loss to Ohio State next week, which may affect their place in the poll in either direction. |
17 |
![]() |
UNC ain't great. Should have won by 35+ according to last week's model, or 30+ according to this week's model in order to not affect their place from last week. |
18 |
![]() |
Strange results. Wyoming seems to be a 40 point underperformance or vs Scar and WVU 20 point overperformances each.  Almost as inconsistent as Pitt. |
19 |
![]() |
Decent wins against teams with quality losses to tOSU who are therefore above-average. |
20 |
![]() |
|
21 |
![]() |
|
22 |
![]() |
|
23 |
![]() |
|
24 |
![]() |
|
25 |
![]() |
Close win vs UCF and "close" loss vs #2 Penn State manage to offset the equally fluky loss to UVA and close win vs Ohio. |
Teams Ranked:
Rank | Team | Unusualness |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
0.44 |
2 |
![]() |
2.28 |
3 |
![]() |
0.54 |
4 |
![]() |
-0.17 |
5 |
![]() |
0.00 |
6 |
![]() |
1.59 |
7 |
![]() |
0.00 |
8 |
![]() |
1.77 |
9 |
![]() |
-1.43 |
10 |
![]() |
-0.39 |
11 |
![]() |
0.00 |
12 |
![]() |
1.96 |
13 |
![]() |
1.79 |
14 |
![]() |
0.00 |
15 |
![]() |
10.14 |
16 |
![]() |
1.43 |
17 |
![]() |
-4.78 |
18 |
![]() |
5.77 |
19 |
![]() |
6.15 |
20 |
![]() |
-1.45 |
21 |
![]() |
3.90 |
22 |
![]() |
-0.14 |
23 |
![]() |
2.19 |
24 |
![]() |
0.98 |
25 |
![]() |
0.22 |
Omissions:
Team | Unusualness |
---|---|
![]() |
3.64 |
![]() |
2.14 |
![]() |
0.50 |
![]() |
0.33 |
![]() |
0.46 |
![]() |
0.31 |
![]() |
0.33 |
Total Score: 57.23