Ballot Type: Computer
Submitted: Nov. 5, 2018, 1:02 a.m.
Overall Rationale: See previous weeks for complete description. Strength of Record-based system that accounts for who you played, where you played them, how good they are now, and how badly you beat them.
Rank | Team | Reason |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
2909 |
2 |
![]() |
2903 |
3 |
![]() |
2659 |
4 |
![]() |
2516 |
5 |
![]() |
2441 |
6 |
![]() |
2271 |
7 |
![]() |
2167 |
8 |
![]() |
1882 |
9 |
![]() |
1826 |
10 |
![]() |
1738 |
11 |
![]() |
1721 |
12 |
![]() |
1663 |
13 |
![]() |
1653; Why Michigan State here? First, note that the scores from #12 to #17 are very, very close - almost interchangeable. Now, note that the model is extremely impressed with MSU being Utah State's only loss. The Big Ten East is also one of the model's favorite divisions, so it's more impressed by a win over Penn State than, say, USC. |
14 |
![]() |
1624; Why UAB here? Again, tight spread from #12 to #17. Oh, you mean why is UAB ranked at all? Because they're 8-1, they have their division locked up tight, and they've allowed 38 points over their last 6 games - 21 of which were to 7-2 UNT, whose only other loss besides UAB is to Louisiana Tech -- whose three losses are #7 LSU, #31 Mississippi State.... and #14 UAB. The Blazers are absolutely dominating the C-USA. |
15 |
![]() |
1616 |
16 |
![]() |
1606 |
17 |
![]() |
1586 |
18 |
![]() |
1545 |
19 |
![]() |
1509 |
20 |
![]() |
1502 |
21 |
![]() |
1488 |
22 |
![]() |
1485; I know, I know: why is a four-loss team ranked? Because they beat Ohio State, they beat Iowa, and they beat Boston College who is apparently sort of decent. That, and most of their losses are fairly forgivable - close games to strong opponents. And also EMU. |
23 |
![]() |
1426 |
24 |
![]() |
1424 |
25 |
![]() |
1415; Next 5 out: Boston College (1381), Iowa State (1378), Florida (1375), Duke (1369), Auburn (1340) |
Teams Ranked:
Rank | Team | Unusualness |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
0.00 |
2 |
![]() |
0.00 |
3 |
![]() |
0.00 |
4 |
![]() |
0.00 |
5 |
![]() |
0.00 |
6 |
![]() |
0.00 |
7 |
![]() |
0.27 |
8 |
![]() |
0.00 |
9 |
![]() |
0.00 |
10 |
![]() |
0.00 |
11 |
![]() |
-0.66 |
12 |
![]() |
0.46 |
13 |
![]() |
2.00 |
14 |
![]() |
4.19 |
15 |
![]() |
0.00 |
16 |
![]() |
0.00 |
17 |
![]() |
-0.49 |
18 |
![]() |
0.49 |
19 |
![]() |
0.00 |
20 |
![]() |
4.67 |
21 |
![]() |
1.09 |
22 |
![]() |
2.75 |
23 |
![]() |
0.00 |
24 |
![]() |
0.00 |
25 |
![]() |
-0.31 |
Omissions:
Team | Unusualness |
---|---|
![]() |
1.38 |
![]() |
0.77 |
![]() |
0.89 |
![]() |
0.76 |
![]() |
0.25 |
Total Score: 21.45