Ballot Type: Human
Submitted: Oct. 2, 2018, 6:58 a.m.
Overall Rationale: Originally I had planned on reviewing teams based on the scoreboard. Win's over everything and quality of the wins can dictate location on the top 25. It has been fun ranking all teams with undefeated records and analyzing what I believe to be the best wins of the week but now I have stumbled upon a curious question, "If I rank teams based on that week's wins and the quality of those wins will I end up with a final year end poll that determines the appropriate final four?" After the preparation of these polls I will work out a way to prepare an adjusted poll which includes the average team rankings from my week to week rankings. This should be a good indicator of who I truly believe has the hardest schedule and best overall season performance.
Rank | Team | Reason |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
Undefeated, Beat top 10 opponent.  |
2 |
![]() |
Undefeated. Beat top 10 opponent.  |
3 |
![]() |
Undefeated. Beat a really good Ole Miss offense, but also beat a really bad Ole Miss defense.  |
4 |
![]() |
Undefeated. Beat a South Carolina team that we all thought would do well this year.  |
5 |
![]() |
Undefeated. Destroyed a Baylor team that we expected them to destroy. Baylor is still building.  |
6 |
![]() |
Undefeated. Throttled opponent, not an impressive scheduled school though.  |
7 |
![]() |
Undefeated. Throttled opponent, not an impressive scheduled school though.  |
8 |
![]() |
Undefeated. Smashed UCON, which others have done.  |
9 |
![]() |
Undefeated... but just barely.  |
10 |
![]() |
Undefeated, beat a potentially good Tech team, but also allowed them to claw back and nearly win.  |
11 |
![]() |
Undefeated. Beat their in conference opponent.  |
12 |
![]() |
Undefeated. Eat Shit Pitt.  |
13 |
![]() |
Undefeated. Colorado is quietly an undefeated PAC-12 team. Man handled a very sad and bad UCLA.  |
14 |
![]() |
4-1, defeated a Top 20 ranked BYU.  |
15 |
![]() |
4-1, defeated a top 25 ranked Cal.  |
16 |
![]() |
4-1 with a win against a top 25 ranked Miss. State that may be bad this year.  |
17 |
![]() |
4-1, defeated in conference opponent.  |
18 |
![]() |
4-1. Beat their in conference opponent that may or may not be good this year. However, K-State was clawing back in the 3Q and 4Q.  |
19 |
![]() |
4-1, Beat in conference opponent.  |
20 |
![]() |
4-1, Scoreboard appears to show them nearly losing to a pretty good Northwestern team.  |
21 |
![]() |
|
22 |
![]() |
|
23 |
![]() |
|
24 |
![]() |
4-1, played Georgia Southern and looking at the score did not do too well against them but got the W.  |
25 |
![]() |
4-1, Losses do not typically get ranked based on my methodology. However, after reviewing the remaining 4-1 games where they played poor opponents I am left with a 4-1 team that had the best loss out of any of the remaining teams. A loss against the top 5 team in the nation by 1 point.  |
Teams Ranked:
Rank | Team | Unusualness |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
0.55 |
2 |
![]() |
0.59 |
3 |
![]() |
0.14 |
4 |
![]() |
1.50 |
5 |
![]() |
0.00 |
6 |
![]() |
-0.67 |
7 |
![]() |
-3.77 |
8 |
![]() |
5.17 |
9 |
![]() |
-0.87 |
10 |
![]() |
0.00 |
11 |
![]() |
1.48 |
12 |
![]() |
0.00 |
13 |
![]() |
1.24 |
14 |
![]() |
-0.11 |
15 |
![]() |
0.46 |
16 |
![]() |
1.33 |
17 |
![]() |
0.00 |
18 |
![]() |
0.00 |
19 |
![]() |
5.87 |
20 |
![]() |
-0.53 |
21 |
![]() |
4.17 |
22 |
![]() |
3.03 |
23 |
![]() |
0.00 |
24 |
![]() |
-3.09 |
25 |
![]() |
-3.22 |
Omissions:
Team | Unusualness |
---|---|
![]() |
2.96 |
![]() |
1.55 |
![]() |
0.35 |
![]() |
0.24 |
Total Score: 42.90