Ballot Type: Hybrid
Submitted: Jan. 20, 2026, 3:09 a.m.
Overall Rationale: Final week notes: I do not punish or actively drop teams who lose in the playoffs or bowl games - it can only help winners get a higher ranking and anyone who goes down in rankings it is because a winner hopped over them. Methodology: FIRST layer (computer portion): SP+, opponents’ SP+, opponents’ opponents’ SP+, opponents’ win %, opponents’ opponents’ win %. SECOND layer (human portion): home/field/away, key injuries, P5/G5 status, watched game factors (ex: offensive/defensive line domination, rush yards after contact, average point of first contact, defensive penetration on non-inside screens, missed tackles, quarterback throwing release speed, overall turnovers, average starting field position, etc). THIRD layer (human portion): wins/losses vs higher-/lower-/non-ranked teams, recency of those results. FOURTH layer (computer portion): Deservedness = Team A cannot be ranked over Team B that has 2+ fewer losses (ex: 9-3 LSU can be ranked over 10-2 Missouri, but 9-3 LSU cannot be ranked over 11-1 Tulane even if LSU beat Tulane heads up, rankings have LSU over Tulane, and/or I think LSU is better than Tulane) unless Team B is giving a X loss allowance to Team A due to significantly fewer P4 games played. Loss allowances come into play when: P5 teams play 2 fewer P5 games than another P5 team (ex: 9-3 Arizona plays 10 P5 games, 11-1 Syracuse plays 8 P5 games, 10-8=2, 9-3 Arizona can be ranked over 11-1 Syracuse); P5 teams play 6 fewer P5 games than a G5 team (11-1 Syracuse plays 8 P5 teams, 9-3 Charlotte plays 2 P5 teams, 8-2=6, 9-3 Charlotte can be ranked over 11-1 Syracuse); G5 teams play 10 fewer P5 teams than a P5 team (ex: 9-3 Arizona plays 10 P5 games, 11-1 Liberty plays 0 P5 games, 10-0=0, 9-3 Arizona can be ranked over 11-1 Liberty); or G5 teams play 2 fewer P5 games than another G5 team (ex: 9-3 Charlotte plays 2 P5 games, 11-1 Liberty plays 0 P5 games, 2-0=2, 9-3 Charlotte can be ranked over 11-1 Liberty). If the game differential exceeds more than 2/6/10/2 in those scenarios, add another loss allowance for each additional P5 game played difference in that scenario.
| Rank | Team | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Indiana Hoosiers
|
+0 |
| 2 |
Miami Hurricanes
|
+11 |
| 3 |
Oregon Ducks
|
+2 |
| 4 |
Ole Miss Rebels
|
+3 |
| 5 |
Ohio State Buckeyes
|
-3 |
| 6 |
Georgia Bulldogs
|
-3 |
| 7 |
Texas Tech Red Raiders
|
-3 |
| 8 |
Alabama Crimson Tide
|
+2 |
| 9 |
Texas A&M Aggies
|
-3 |
| 10 |
Oklahoma Sooners
|
-2 |
| 11 |
BYU Cougars
|
-2 |
| 12 |
Utah Utes
|
-1 |
| 13 |
Virginia Cavaliers
|
-1 |
| 14 |
Notre Dame Fighting Irish
|
+0 |
| 15 |
Vanderbilt Commodores
|
+0 |
| 16 |
Tulane Green Wave
|
+0 |
| 17 |
James Madison Dukes
|
+0 |
| 18 |
Texas Longhorns
|
+0 |
| 19 |
TCU Horned Frogs
|
+2 |
| 20 |
USC Trojans
|
-1 |
| 21 |
Michigan Wolverines
|
-1 |
| 22 |
Houston Cougars
|
+0 |
| 23 |
Arizona Wildcats
|
+0 |
| 24 |
Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets
|
+0 |
| 25 |
USF Bulls
|
+0 |
Teams Ranked:
| Rank | Team | Unusualness |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Indiana Hoosiers
|
0.00 |
| 2 |
Miami Hurricanes
|
0.00 |
| 3 |
Oregon Ducks
|
0.16 |
| 4 |
Ole Miss Rebels
|
0.00 |
| 5 |
Ohio State Buckeyes
|
0.00 |
| 6 |
Georgia Bulldogs
|
0.00 |
| 7 |
Texas Tech Red Raiders
|
0.00 |
| 8 |
Alabama Crimson Tide
|
0.20 |
| 9 |
Texas A&M Aggies
|
0.00 |
| 10 |
Oklahoma Sooners
|
0.23 |
| 11 |
BYU Cougars
|
0.00 |
| 12 |
Utah Utes
|
0.00 |
| 13 |
Virginia Cavaliers
|
0.67 |
| 14 |
Notre Dame Fighting Irish
|
0.00 |
| 15 |
Vanderbilt Commodores
|
0.00 |
| 16 |
Tulane Green Wave
|
0.00 |
| 17 |
James Madison Dukes
|
0.00 |
| 18 |
Texas Longhorns
|
-0.89 |
| 19 |
TCU Horned Frogs
|
1.85 |
| 20 |
USC Trojans
|
0.00 |
| 21 |
Michigan Wolverines
|
0.00 |
| 22 |
Houston Cougars
|
0.00 |
| 23 |
Arizona Wildcats
|
1.24 |
| 24 |
Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets
|
0.00 |
| 25 |
USF Bulls
|
0.00 |
Omissions:
| Team | Unusualness |
|---|---|
Iowa Hawkeyes
|
1.15 |
North Texas Mean Green
|
0.42 |
Navy Midshipmen
|
0.41 |
Total Score: 7.22