Ballot Type: Human
Submitted: Nov. 16, 2025, 6:37 p.m.
Overall Rationale: In my view, winning is most important, and head-to-head wins next-most important. There are three main theories of ranking teams: •1. hypothetical "best" rankings where responders make guesses about who would win in hypothetical situations; •2. tiered rankings of teams with equal records, often called "resume" rankings; •3. hybrids of the above where ballots make an effort to combine hypothetical outcomes with on-field results. The vast majority of rankings are use systems 1 or 3. I object to these as being too fantastic and relying too much upon the imaginations of the voters who set teams with poorer records and more losses ahead of teams with better records and fewer losses because they "know" (i.e., have predetermined) that those teams are better. Do I think one-loss JMU would beat all of the teams who have two losses that I've ranked below them? I don't know, but I don't view that a relevant question to be asking. They lost fewer games, and have earned the right to be ranked ahead of teams who have lost more. The second line of thinking that deviates from the majority of ballot submissions here is the internal order for undefeated, one-loss, and multiple-loss teams. I differ in my perspective from the majority of ballot submissions in my interpretation of which one-loss or two-loss teams I will list in which order, based upon my perspectives of which conferences and which teams are stronger than others. Head-to-head also matters, which is why some programs are ranked much lower than in other polls as teams who have lost to teams who have lost to teams have to go in the order of who they've lost to if they have the same number of losses. Here I again differ from the norm in viewing conferences as largely being equivalent to each other to a greater degree than most appear to. I functionally treat all of college football like a giant conference. This leads to my greater willingness to rate one- or two-loss teams from the Big XII, the ACC, and yes, even the AAC or MWC, ahead of one- or two-loss teams in the Big Ten or SEC. We don't know which teams who haven’t played each other but who have the same number of losses are better. So a ballot submitter can make a choice for themselves in which order to put teams with an equal number of losses. There were over 300 voters in the main poll last week. My ballot was less than 1/300 of these voices. I chose to use my small voice here to advocate for a different interpretation, a different reading, of college football than the one advocated by ESPN and the AP. I maintain that it is important for there to be lots of different voices and perspectives in a poll like this one.
| Rank | Team | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Indiana Hoosiers
|
AP #2, undefeated |
| 2 |
Ohio State Buckeyes
|
AP #1, undefeated |
| 3 |
Texas A&M Aggies
|
AP #3, undefeated |
| 4 |
Oregon Ducks
|
AP #6, Loss to Indiana |
| 5 |
Texas Tech Red Raiders
|
AP #6, Loss to Arizona State |
| 6 |
BYU Cougars
|
AP #11, Loss to Texas Tech |
| 7 |
Georgia Bulldogs
|
AP #4, Loss to Alabama |
| 8 |
Ole Miss Rebels
|
AP #5, Loss to Alabama |
| 9 |
Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets
|
AP #15, Loss to NC State |
| 10 |
James Madison Dukes
|
AP #21, Loss to Louisville |
| 11 |
North Texas Mean Green
|
AP #22, Loss to USF |
| 12 |
Utah Utes
|
AP #13, Loss to Texas Tech and BYU |
| 13 |
Oklahoma Sooners
|
AP #8, Loss to Texas and Ole Miss |
| 14 |
Miami Hurricanes
|
AP #14, Loss to Louisville and SMU |
| 15 |
Notre Dame Fighting Irish
|
AP #9, Loss to Texas A&M and Miami |
| 16 |
USC Trojans
|
AP #16, Loss to Illinois and Notre Dame |
| 17 |
Michigan Wolverines
|
AP #18, Loss to USC and Oklahoma |
| 18 |
Alabama Crimson Tide
|
AP #10, Loss to Florida State and Oklahoma |
| 19 |
Vanderbilt Commodores
|
AP #12, Loss to Alabama and Texas |
| 20 |
Houston Cougars
|
AP #25, Loss to Texas Tech and West Virginia |
| 21 |
Virginia Cavaliers
|
AP #19, Loss to NC State and Wake Forest |
| 22 |
Tulane Green Wave
|
AP #24, Loss to Ole Miss and UAB |
| 23 |
Navy Midshipmen
|
AP unranked, Loss to North Texas and Notre Dame |
| 24 |
San Diego State Aztecs
|
AP unranked, Loss to Washington State and Hawai'i |
| 25 |
WKU Hilltoppers
|
AP unranked, Loss to Toledo and FIU |
Teams Ranked:
| Rank | Team | Unusualness |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Indiana Hoosiers
|
0.06 |
| 2 |
Ohio State Buckeyes
|
0.00 |
| 3 |
Texas A&M Aggies
|
0.00 |
| 4 |
Oregon Ducks
|
0.50 |
| 5 |
Texas Tech Red Raiders
|
0.00 |
| 6 |
BYU Cougars
|
0.81 |
| 7 |
Georgia Bulldogs
|
-1.78 |
| 8 |
Ole Miss Rebels
|
-0.07 |
| 9 |
Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets
|
0.64 |
| 10 |
James Madison Dukes
|
2.15 |
| 11 |
North Texas Mean Green
|
1.98 |
| 12 |
Utah Utes
|
0.00 |
| 13 |
Oklahoma Sooners
|
-0.52 |
| 14 |
Miami Hurricanes
|
0.00 |
| 15 |
Notre Dame Fighting Irish
|
-1.10 |
| 16 |
USC Trojans
|
0.00 |
| 17 |
Michigan Wolverines
|
0.00 |
| 18 |
Alabama Crimson Tide
|
-2.30 |
| 19 |
Vanderbilt Commodores
|
-0.57 |
| 20 |
Houston Cougars
|
0.67 |
| 21 |
Virginia Cavaliers
|
-0.05 |
| 22 |
Tulane Green Wave
|
0.03 |
| 23 |
Navy Midshipmen
|
0.85 |
| 24 |
San Diego State Aztecs
|
0.95 |
| 25 |
WKU Hilltoppers
|
0.20 |
Omissions:
| Team | Unusualness |
|---|---|
Texas Longhorns
|
0.99 |
Tennessee Volunteers
|
0.47 |
Missouri Tigers
|
0.13 |
Total Score: 16.83