Ballot Type: Hybrid
Submitted: Nov. 9, 2025, 3:52 p.m.
Overall Rationale: Week 12 notes: head-to-head results still driving a lot of rankings. Methodology: FIRST layer (computer portion): SP+, opponents’ SP+, opponents’ opponents’ SP+, opponents’ win %, opponents’ opponents’ win %. SECOND layer (human portion): home/field/away, key injuries, P5/G5 status, watched game factors (ex: offensive/defensive line domination, rush yards after contact, average point of first contact, defensive penetration on non-inside screens, missed tackles, quarterback throwing release speed, overall turnovers, average starting field position, etc). THIRD layer (human portion): wins/losses vs higher-/lower-/non-ranked teams, recency of those results. FOURTH layer (computer portion): Deservedness = Team A cannot be ranked over Team B that has 2+ fewer losses (ex: 9-3 LSU can be ranked over 10-2 Missouri, but 9-3 LSU cannot be ranked over 11-1 Tulane even if LSU beat Tulane heads up, rankings have LSU over Tulane, and/or I think LSU is better than Tulane) unless Team B is giving a X loss allowance to Team A due to significantly fewer P4 games played. Loss allowances come into play when: P5 teams play 2 fewer P5 games than another P5 team (ex: 9-3 Arizona plays 10 P5 games, 11-1 Syracuse plays 8 P5 games, 10-8=2, 9-3 Arizona can be ranked over 11-1 Syracuse); P5 teams play 6 fewer P5 games than a G5 team (11-1 Syracuse plays 8 P5 teams, 9-3 Charlotte plays 2 P5 teams, 8-2=6, 9-3 Charlotte can be ranked over 11-1 Syracuse); G5 teams play 10 fewer P5 teams than a P5 team (ex: 9-3 Arizona plays 10 P5 games, 11-1 Liberty plays 0 P5 games, 10-0=0, 9-3 Arizona can be ranked over 11-1 Liberty); or G5 teams play 2 fewer P5 games than another G5 team (ex: 9-3 Charlotte plays 2 P5 games, 11-1 Liberty plays 0 P5 games, 2-0=2, 9-3 Charlotte can be ranked over 11-1 Liberty). If the game differential exceeds more than 2/6/10/2 in those scenarios, add another loss allowance for each additional P5 game played difference in that scenario.
| Rank | Team | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Indiana Hoosiers
|
+0. Would be the #1 playoff seed in this scenario, playing the winner of #8 Ole Miss/#9 BYU in the Rose Bowl |
| 2 |
Ohio State Buckeyes
|
+0. Would be the #2 playoff seed in this scenario, playing the winner of #7 Texas Tech/#10 Utah in the Orange Bowl |
| 3 |
Texas A&M Aggies
|
+0. Would be the #3 playoff seed in this scenario, playing the winner of #6 Oregon/#11 Virginia in the Sugar Bowl |
| 4 |
Alabama Crimson Tide
|
+0. Would be the #4 playoff seed in this scenario, playing the winner of #5 Georgia/#12 Tulane in the Cotton Bow |
| 5 |
Georgia Bulldogs
|
+0. Would be the #5 playoff seed in this scenario, hosting #12 Tulane in the first round |
| 6 |
Oregon Ducks
|
+0. Would be the #6 playoff seed in this scenario, hosting #11 Virginia in the first round |
| 7 |
Texas Tech Red Raiders
|
+3. Would be the #7 playoff seed in this scenario, hosting #10 Utah in the first round |
| 8 |
Ole Miss Rebels
|
-1. Would be the #8 playoff seed in this scenario, hosting #9 BYU in the first round |
| 9 |
BYU Cougars
|
+2. Would be the #9 playoff seed in this scenario, playing at #8 Ole Miss in the first round. Rise despite loss partially due to other teams losing |
| 10 |
Utah Utes
|
+2. Would be the #10 playoff seed in this scenario, playing at #7 Texas Tech in the first round |
| 11 |
Virginia Cavaliers
|
-3. Would be the #11 playoff seed in this scenario, playing at #6 Oregon in the first round. Head-to-head over Louisville |
| 12 |
Louisville Cardinals
|
-3. Head-to-head over Miami and Pitt |
| 13 |
Miami Hurricanes
|
+0. Head-to-head over Notre Dame |
| 14 |
Notre Dame Fighting Irish
|
+0. Head-to-head over USC |
| 15 |
USC Trojans
|
+0. Head-to-head over Michigan |
| 16 |
Texas Longhorns
|
+0. Head-to-head over Oklahoma and Vanderbilt |
| 17 |
Oklahoma Sooners
|
+0. Head-to-head over Michigan |
| 18 |
Vanderbilt Commodores
|
+0 |
| 19 |
Michigan Wolverines
|
+0 |
| 20 |
Cincinnati Bearcats
|
+4 |
| 21 |
Pittsburgh Panthers
|
+4 |
| 22 |
Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets
|
NEW |
| 23 |
TCU Horned Frogs
|
+0. Stay despite loss due to Deservedness loss allowance over JMU (11 P4 games - 1 P4 games = 10 difference = +1 loss allowance) |
| 24 |
Houston Cougars
|
NEW |
| 25 |
Tulane Green Wave
|
NEW. Would be the #12 playoff seed in this scenario, playing at #5 Georgia in the first round. Next five: Memphis, USF, JMU, Iowa (Deservedness loss allowance over North Texas (10 P4 games - 0 P4 games = 10 difference = +1 loss allowance), Illinois (Deservedness loss allowance over North Texas (10 P4 games - 0 P4 games = 10 difference = +1 loss allowance). Missouri, Washington drop out due to no Deservedness loss allowance over either JMU or North Texas. Iowa drops out due to no Deservedness loss allowance over JMU |
Teams Ranked:
| Rank | Team | Unusualness |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Indiana Hoosiers
|
0.17 |
| 2 |
Ohio State Buckeyes
|
0.00 |
| 3 |
Texas A&M Aggies
|
0.00 |
| 4 |
Alabama Crimson Tide
|
0.00 |
| 5 |
Georgia Bulldogs
|
0.00 |
| 6 |
Oregon Ducks
|
0.00 |
| 7 |
Texas Tech Red Raiders
|
0.00 |
| 8 |
Ole Miss Rebels
|
0.00 |
| 9 |
BYU Cougars
|
0.05 |
| 10 |
Utah Utes
|
0.69 |
| 11 |
Virginia Cavaliers
|
1.91 |
| 12 |
Louisville Cardinals
|
1.63 |
| 13 |
Miami Hurricanes
|
0.06 |
| 14 |
Notre Dame Fighting Irish
|
-0.27 |
| 15 |
USC Trojans
|
0.00 |
| 16 |
Texas Longhorns
|
-0.21 |
| 17 |
Oklahoma Sooners
|
-0.42 |
| 18 |
Vanderbilt Commodores
|
-0.27 |
| 19 |
Michigan Wolverines
|
0.00 |
| 20 |
Cincinnati Bearcats
|
0.29 |
| 21 |
Pittsburgh Panthers
|
0.00 |
| 22 |
Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets
|
-1.51 |
| 23 |
TCU Horned Frogs
|
2.24 |
| 24 |
Houston Cougars
|
0.00 |
| 25 |
Tulane Green Wave
|
0.00 |
Omissions:
| Team | Unusualness |
|---|---|
James Madison Dukes
|
0.16 |
North Texas Mean Green
|
0.07 |
Tennessee Volunteers
|
0.17 |
Total Score: 10.11