Ballot Type: Human
Submitted: Oct. 28, 2025, 2:29 a.m.
Overall Rationale: Last week my ballot submission was met with some emotional responses, so I will provide more explanation this week of my ranking methodology. There are three main theories of ranking teams: 1. hypothetical "best" rankings where responders make guesses about who would win in hypothetical situations; 2. tiered rankings of teams with equal records, often called "resume" rankings; 3. hybrids of the above where ballots make an effort to combine hypothetical outcomes with on-field results. The vast majority of rankings are use systems 1 or 3. I object to these as being too fantastic and relying too much upon the imaginations of the voters who set teams with poorer records and more losses ahead of teams with better records and fewer losses because they "know" that those teams are better than the ones that have fewer losses than they do. Do I think Navy at 7-0 would beat all of the teams who have losses that I've ranked below them? I don't know, but I don't view that a relevant question to be asking. They didn't lose any games! It's hard not to lose games, and by this point in the season, only six teams have managed to do it. I believe you rank teams who haven't lost games above teams who have. Similarly, if a team has only lost one game, I contend that this is a better record and therefore I will rank them higher than teams who have lost two or more games. Do I think that some 2-loss teams would certainly beat some 1-loss teams? I contend it doesn't matter! They have fewer losses and are therefore worthy of being ranked ahead of the teams with more losses. This has proven to be very controversial, and a lot of people fundamentally disagree with this line of thinking. But the fact that a lot of people disagree with an idea doesn't invalidate the idea. If you do disagree, you will likely oppose to this line of thinking and object this ballot. That's okay, because lots of different people have many different opinions. The second line of thinking that deviates from the majority of ballot submissions here is the internal order for undefeated, one-loss, and multiple-loss teams. I differ in my perspective from the majority of ballot submissions in my interpretation of which one-loss teams I will list in which order, based upon my perspectives of which conferences and which teams are stronger than others. Here I again differ from the norm in viewing conferences as largely being equivalent to each other to a greater degree than most appear to, and my willingness to rate one-loss teams from the Big XII, the ACC, and yes, even the AAC or MWC, ahead of one-loss teams in the Big Ten or SEC. It strikes me as unusual that this statement should be so controversial, but it decidedly is. We don't know if Louisville or Houston is better than Alabama or Georgia, all of whom have the same number of losses. Most folks have decided that Alabama and Georgia are innately superior to Oregon or Texas Tech; I disagree, and am using my ballot to disagree in the one forum where that disagreement can be voiced. There were 306 voters in the main poll last week. My ballot was 1/306 of these voices. I chose to use my small voice here to advocate for a different interpretation, a different reading, of college football than the one advocated by ESPN and the AP. I maintain that it is important for there to be lots of different voices and perspectives in a poll like this one.
| Rank | Team | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Indiana Hoosiers
|
AP #2 |
| 2 |
Ohio State Buckeyes
|
AP #1 |
| 3 |
BYU Cougars
|
AP #10 |
| 4 |
Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets
|
AP #8 |
| 5 |
Texas A&M Aggies
|
AP #3 |
| 6 |
Navy Midshipmen
|
AP unranked |
| 7 |
Oregon Ducks
|
AP # 6, loss to Indiana |
| 8 |
Texas Tech Red Raiders
|
AP #13, loss to ASU |
| 9 |
Alabama Crimson Tide
|
AP #4, loss to Florida State |
| 10 |
Houston Cougars
|
AP #22, loss to Texas Tech |
| 11 |
Georgia Bulldogs
|
AP #5, loss to Alabama |
| 12 |
Virginia Cavaliers
|
AP #15, loss to NC State |
| 13 |
Vanderbilt Commodores
|
AP #9, loss to Alabama |
| 14 |
Ole Miss Rebels
|
AP #7, loss to LSU |
| 15 |
Louisville Cardinals
|
AP #16, loss to Virginia |
| 16 |
Miami Hurricanes
|
AP #10, loss to Louisville |
| 17 |
Cincinnati Bearcats
|
AP #17, loss to Nebraska |
| 18 |
Memphis Tigers
|
AP #25, loss to USF |
| 19 |
Tulane Green Wave
|
AP unranked, loss to Ole Miss |
| 20 |
North Texas Mean Green
|
AP unranked, loss to USF |
| 21 |
James Madison Dukes
|
AP unranked, loss to Lousiville |
| 22 |
San Diego State Aztecs
|
AP unranked, loss to Washington State |
| 23 |
UNLV Rebels
|
AP unranked, loss to Boise State |
| 24 |
Notre Dame Fighting Irish
|
AP #12, loss to Texas A&M and Miami |
| 25 |
Utah Utes
|
AP 24, loss to Texas Tech and BYU |
Teams Ranked:
| Rank | Team | Unusualness |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Indiana Hoosiers
|
0.00 |
| 2 |
Ohio State Buckeyes
|
0.00 |
| 3 |
BYU Cougars
|
0.75 |
| 4 |
Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets
|
0.28 |
| 5 |
Texas A&M Aggies
|
-0.86 |
| 6 |
Navy Midshipmen
|
2.46 |
| 7 |
Oregon Ducks
|
0.00 |
| 8 |
Texas Tech Red Raiders
|
0.60 |
| 9 |
Alabama Crimson Tide
|
-0.95 |
| 10 |
Houston Cougars
|
1.89 |
| 11 |
Georgia Bulldogs
|
-0.94 |
| 12 |
Virginia Cavaliers
|
0.33 |
| 13 |
Vanderbilt Commodores
|
-0.28 |
| 14 |
Ole Miss Rebels
|
-1.25 |
| 15 |
Louisville Cardinals
|
0.00 |
| 16 |
Miami Hurricanes
|
-0.98 |
| 17 |
Cincinnati Bearcats
|
0.00 |
| 18 |
Memphis Tigers
|
1.21 |
| 19 |
Tulane Green Wave
|
1.55 |
| 20 |
North Texas Mean Green
|
4.64 |
| 21 |
James Madison Dukes
|
3.63 |
| 22 |
San Diego State Aztecs
|
2.93 |
| 23 |
UNLV Rebels
|
2.10 |
| 24 |
Notre Dame Fighting Irish
|
-1.46 |
| 25 |
Utah Utes
|
0.00 |
Omissions:
| Team | Unusualness |
|---|---|
Tennessee Volunteers
|
1.07 |
Oklahoma Sooners
|
1.04 |
Missouri Tigers
|
0.63 |
Michigan Wolverines
|
0.53 |
Texas Longhorns
|
0.29 |
USC Trojans
|
0.22 |
Total Score: 32.85