Ballot Type: Computer
Submitted: Oct. 19, 2025, 3:10 p.m.
Overall Rationale: I have made my own ELO-rating system (similar to chess) for college football. Only final scores are considered in the ratings. W-L records do not matter. Margin of victory matters. My code is on github here: https://github.com/kyleaforrester/cfb_elo Losing to a good team might actually improve your rating if you played them close enough. Beating a bad team with a slim margin might drop your rating if your margin of victory isn't good enough. I don't care about the end W-L result or the W-L team records, just how each team performs when compared to what was expected of them.
Rank | Team | Reason |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
445 Elo - Win @ Wisconsin +4.8 Elo |
2 |
![]() |
335 Elo - Win @ Rutgers +15.3 Elo |
3 |
![]() |
325 Elo - Win vs Michigan St. -4.0 Elo |
4 |
![]() |
276 Elo - Win @ Kentucky -25.1 Elo |
5 |
![]() |
274 Elo - Win vs Tennessee +6.7 Elo |
6 |
![]() |
274 Elo - Win vs USC -0.4 Elo |
7 |
![]() |
273 Elo - Win vs Ole Miss -4.0 Elo |
8 |
![]() |
259 Elo - Win vs LSU +6.9 Elo |
9 |
![]() |
238 Elo - Loss vs Louisville -44.5 Elo |
10 |
![]() |
235 Elo - Loss @ Arizona St. -30.3 Elo |
11 |
![]() |
229 Elo - Loss @ Vandy -6.9 Elo |
12 |
![]() |
220 Elo - Loss @ UGA +3.5 Elo |
13 |
![]() |
214 Elo - Win @ South Carolina +44.2 Elo |
14 |
![]() |
204 Elo - Win @ Arkansas -7.9 Elo |
15 |
![]() |
202 Elo - Loss @ Notre Dame +0.4 Elo |
16 |
![]() |
197 Elo - Win vs Penn State -9.4 Elo |
17 |
![]() |
196 Elo - Win @ Auburn +13.9 Elo |
18 |
![]() |
189 Elo - Loss @ Iowa +9.4 Elo |
19 |
![]() |
186 Elo - Loss @ BYU -3.3 Elo |
20 |
![]() |
178 Elo - Loss @ Alabama -7.7 Elo |
21 |
![]() |
172 Elo - Win vs Utah +3.3 Elo |
22 |
![]() |
160 Elo - Win @ Miami +44.5 Elo |
23 |
![]() |
160 Elo - Win vs Washington +34.0 Elo |
24 |
![]() |
156 Elo - No change/game this week |
25 |
![]() |
153 Elo - Win @ Clemson +24.1 Elo |
Teams Ranked:
Rank | Team | Unusualness |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
0.00 |
2 |
![]() |
0.62 |
3 |
![]() |
-0.41 |
4 |
![]() |
5.26 |
5 |
![]() |
0.00 |
6 |
![]() |
1.09 |
7 |
![]() |
0.00 |
8 |
![]() |
0.29 |
9 |
![]() |
0.00 |
10 |
![]() |
0.08 |
11 |
![]() |
2.95 |
12 |
![]() |
0.00 |
13 |
![]() |
0.00 |
14 |
![]() |
-7.59 |
15 |
![]() |
2.27 |
16 |
![]() |
8.98 |
17 |
![]() |
0.00 |
18 |
![]() |
7.23 |
19 |
![]() |
1.55 |
20 |
![]() |
0.00 |
21 |
![]() |
-2.47 |
22 |
![]() |
-0.46 |
23 |
![]() |
0.00 |
24 |
![]() |
0.00 |
25 |
![]() |
0.19 |
Omissions:
Team | Unusualness |
---|---|
![]() |
4.06 |
![]() |
1.83 |
![]() |
1.46 |
![]() |
1.12 |
![]() |
0.15 |
Total Score: 50.03