Ballot Type: Human
Submitted: Oct. 12, 2025, 9:59 a.m.
Overall Rationale: Teams with losses must be ranked behind all teams they've lost to
Rank | Team | Reason |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
|
2 |
![]() |
|
3 |
![]() |
|
4 |
![]() |
|
5 |
![]() |
|
6 |
![]() |
|
7 |
![]() |
|
8 |
![]() |
|
9 |
![]() |
|
10 |
![]() |
|
11 |
![]() |
|
12 |
![]() |
|
13 |
![]() |
|
14 |
![]() |
|
15 |
![]() |
|
16 |
![]() |
|
17 |
![]() |
Normally there's also a clause about needing teams to be over .500, but I made an exception here because of how many 1-loss teams are down the chain from Florida while still being above the tangle of teams with transitive losses to teams they've beaten. |
18 |
![]() |
|
19 |
![]() |
|
20 |
![]() |
|
21 |
![]() |
|
22 |
![]() |
|
23 |
![]() |
|
24 |
![]() |
Nope, still no "quality wins" to speak of. Arizona would've been one, but Colorado took care of that. |
25 |
![]() |
Teams Ranked:
Rank | Team | Unusualness |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
0.10 |
2 |
![]() |
0.00 |
3 |
![]() |
0.70 |
4 |
![]() |
-1.42 |
5 |
![]() |
2.89 |
6 |
![]() |
-0.05 |
7 |
![]() |
0.85 |
8 |
![]() |
-0.31 |
9 |
![]() |
3.67 |
10 |
![]() |
2.90 |
11 |
![]() |
14.13 |
12 |
![]() |
8.16 |
13 |
![]() |
0.25 |
14 |
![]() |
0.00 |
15 |
![]() |
0.12 |
16 |
![]() |
0.11 |
17 |
![]() |
8.17 |
18 |
![]() |
7.22 |
19 |
![]() |
0.43 |
20 |
![]() |
-1.65 |
21 |
![]() |
-0.21 |
22 |
![]() |
0.00 |
23 |
![]() |
1.82 |
24 |
![]() |
-1.61 |
25 |
![]() |
0.16 |
Omissions:
Team | Unusualness |
---|---|
![]() |
6.02 |
![]() |
4.37 |
![]() |
2.30 |
![]() |
1.40 |
![]() |
1.17 |
![]() |
1.02 |
![]() |
0.33 |
![]() |
0.24 |
Total Score: 73.78