Ballot Type: Human
Submitted: Sept. 16, 2025, 3:44 a.m.
Overall Rationale: I didn't want reward teams with a loss, with a top 10 slot. However, with only 3 games to examine, I didn't want to overly punish teams like Texas, Alabama, and Tennessee who have one loss, all to my admittedly top 10 teams. I wanted to reward GT and Vanderbilt for impressive wins, but not so much that I overvalued their opponents. Unfortunately we won't know the value of Clemson or South Carolina for a few weeks, or the result of the head to head until the last week; So I put both ahead of one loss Michigan until some of that gets resolved. I dropped Notre Dame out entirely in favor of BYU; I do not feel a winless team deserves a top 25 spot, though those losses appear quality, there is more to see out of specifically Texas A&M, and to a lesser degree, Miami. It would be a disservice to other programs to allow them to stay ranked in the meantime.
Rank | Team | Reason |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
National champions who return as much talent as Ohio State deserve to remain #1 until a loss, or talent becomes questionable. Neither are true yet. |
2 |
![]() |
Probably an overreaction to an easy win over USF, who toppled Florida the previous week. I don't see them having any issues this week at home with Florida, but the close score with Notre Dame might be a problem later. |
3 |
![]() |
I debated LSU at #2, they certainly have strength of record. I just don't know if Clemson and Florida are particularly stronger on paper as time goes on. |
4 |
![]() |
Three cupcakes to start the season, but I didn't see anything in those games to raise alarm. |
5 |
![]() |
It's becoming more clear that Alabama isn't the piss poor team they were made out to be. Alabama @ UGA will answer a lot of questions for all three programs. |
6 |
![]() |
Would have liked to see more in the Northwestern game, but the game was away. The thrashing of Oklahoma State holds Oregon at #6. |
7 |
![]() |
Austin Peay was a problem, and I'm tired of pretending it wasn't. Tennessee could have, and probably should have, won that game. But I don't like punishing teams for winning tough games on the road. So solidly #7. |
8 |
![]() |
Is Duke bad? Almost certainly. Does Illinois have 4 AP ranked opponents in a row to prove they're legit? They sure do. |
9 |
![]() |
They brought down Michigan, handled their week 1 with relative ease, and had a good showing against Temple. It was a tough choice between 9 and 10. |
10 |
![]() |
I'm rewarding them for Notre Dame, away, that's pretty much it. They allowed UTSA and Utah State to score 24 and 22 points respectively, that's not a good look, but we'll see if #10 suits A&M in short order. |
11 |
![]() |
|
12 |
![]() |
|
13 |
![]() |
|
14 |
![]() |
|
15 |
![]() |
|
16 |
![]() |
|
17 |
![]() |
|
18 |
![]() |
|
19 |
![]() |
|
20 |
![]() |
|
21 |
![]() |
|
22 |
![]() |
|
23 |
![]() |
|
24 |
![]() |
|
25 |
![]() |
Teams Ranked:
Rank | Team | Unusualness |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
0.00 |
2 |
![]() |
0.00 |
3 |
![]() |
0.13 |
4 |
![]() |
0.00 |
5 |
![]() |
0.19 |
6 |
![]() |
0.00 |
7 |
![]() |
0.00 |
8 |
![]() |
0.03 |
9 |
![]() |
0.00 |
10 |
![]() |
0.00 |
11 |
![]() |
0.08 |
12 |
![]() |
0.00 |
13 |
![]() |
0.00 |
14 |
![]() |
0.47 |
15 |
![]() |
0.00 |
16 |
![]() |
0.00 |
17 |
![]() |
0.00 |
18 |
![]() |
0.00 |
19 |
![]() |
0.00 |
20 |
![]() |
0.00 |
21 |
![]() |
0.02 |
22 |
![]() |
0.00 |
23 |
![]() |
-0.06 |
24 |
![]() |
0.00 |
25 |
![]() |
0.00 |
No major omissions.
Total Score: 0.99