Ballot Type: Computer
Submitted: Sept. 15, 2025, 11:32 p.m.
Overall Rationale: I have two predictive models - one that predicts how many points a team will score and one that predicts if they will win or lose. I simulate every FBS team against each other in each model and average the ranks based on who wins the most and who scores the most/allows the fewest points. Occasionally if there's a team that doesn't make sense based on the eye test I'll adjust or replace them (see notes for details). Model is pretty unhinged and volatile this early since there isn't much data - it will definitely overreact to big blowouts early on.
Rank | Team | Reason |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
+1, this matches my eye test |
2 |
![]() |
+2 |
3 |
![]() |
+2, I have no idea why the model is ranking them so high. I will start to manually adjust this in the next couple weeks |
4 |
![]() |
+4 |
5 |
![]() |
+1 |
6 |
![]() |
-3 |
7 |
![]() |
-6, they keep escaping upsets against decent teams so SOS is carrying them in the model right now, but I think the lack of defense last week knocked them down |
8 |
![]() |
-1, looked at lot better against Wiscy but I still think this is too high for now |
9 |
![]() |
+3, their RB looks like the real deal |
10 |
![]() |
+1 |
11 |
![]() |
-2, soooo close against UGA |
12 |
![]() |
+28 (!), lots of early season volatility here but this could be about right if Underwood continues to improve |
13 |
![]() |
+1, I think they did outplay A&M but just choked the extra point at the end... |
14 |
![]() |
-4, can we please have 2024 Arch back |
15 |
![]() |
+5, as a Texas fan I hate to say it but this may be a very good team |
16 |
![]() |
+2, Michigan should be on upset watch here |
17 |
![]() |
+2 |
18 |
![]() |
+4, as a Texas fan I hate to say this even more but they are very underrated by the model. This is a very dangerous team |
19 |
![]() |
-4 |
20 |
![]() |
+10, fun Vandy is back! |
21 |
![]() |
-8 |
22 |
![]() |
-5 |
23 |
![]() |
-2 |
24 |
![]() |
-8 |
25 |
![]() |
-2 |
Teams Ranked:
Rank | Team | Unusualness |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
0.27 |
2 |
![]() |
0.07 |
3 |
![]() |
2.28 |
4 |
![]() |
1.93 |
5 |
![]() |
0.00 |
6 |
![]() |
-0.51 |
7 |
![]() |
0.45 |
8 |
![]() |
1.70 |
9 |
![]() |
1.20 |
10 |
![]() |
-0.45 |
11 |
![]() |
0.78 |
12 |
![]() |
2.96 |
13 |
![]() |
7.99 |
14 |
![]() |
0.00 |
15 |
![]() |
-0.23 |
16 |
![]() |
2.39 |
17 |
![]() |
0.00 |
18 |
![]() |
-1.50 |
19 |
![]() |
0.00 |
20 |
![]() |
0.00 |
21 |
![]() |
4.20 |
22 |
![]() |
1.07 |
23 |
![]() |
-1.47 |
24 |
![]() |
0.00 |
25 |
![]() |
0.00 |
Omissions:
Team | Unusualness |
---|---|
![]() |
4.46 |
![]() |
2.45 |
![]() |
1.71 |
![]() |
1.22 |
![]() |
0.43 |
Total Score: 41.72