Ballot Type: Human
Submitted: Sept. 15, 2025, 5:24 p.m.
Overall Rationale: Games & Highlights watched plus personal feelings of likelihood to compete for a playoff spot. (May become hybrid in future ballots; rebuilding out old computer formula). Warnings Addressed: Texas - I really don't believe, but in my first 5 out. South Carolina - In first 5 out. Sellers will probably be a Heisman finalist but were saw to a degree that if he's ever contained then the rest of the offense can't compliment. Notre Dame - In first 5 out. They gotta get a good looking win. Clemson - In first 5 out. Tough start to season, think they will bounce back but maybe not ACC CCG. TCU - UNC not as good as we thought. Weak schedule for dropping them. Arizona State - First 5 out.
Rank | Team | Reason |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
Serious Contender |
2 |
![]() |
Serious Contender |
3 |
![]() |
Serious Contender |
4 |
![]() |
Serious Contender |
5 |
![]() |
Serious Contender |
6 |
![]() |
Haynes Kings makes me believe |
7 |
![]() |
Serious Contender |
8 |
![]() |
Serious Contender |
9 |
![]() |
Diego Pavia makes me believe |
10 |
![]() |
Playing Good Ball ... but I want to see more / Crowded at the Top |
11 |
![]() |
Playing Good Ball ... but I want to see more / Crowded at the Top |
12 |
![]() |
Playing Good Ball ... but I want to see more / Crowded at the Top |
13 |
![]() |
Playing Good Ball ... but I want to see more / Crowded at the Top |
14 |
![]() |
Playing Good Ball ... but I want to see more / Crowded at the Top |
15 |
![]() |
Playing Good Ball ... but I want to see more / Crowded at the Top |
16 |
![]() |
Playing Good Ball ... but I want to see more / Crowded at the Top |
17 |
![]() |
Looking the part |
18 |
![]() |
Dropped for struggling vs what seems will be bad/average team in the end |
19 |
![]() |
Looking the part of the 5th Conference Champ Autobid |
20 |
![]() |
I don't fully believe but they are looking the part. Illinois should be a good one but afraid Illinois will run away with it. |
21 |
![]() |
USF & Tulane: I essentially swapped their spots. Hopefully they are on a collision course for the American CCG. Like last week USF had a chance to prove themselves (and bombed) this week Tulane gets to show how they stack up |
22 |
![]() |
Playing decent ball and are a fun team to follow. |
23 |
![]() |
Grinding out some wins, let's see if it continues |
24 |
![]() |
Feels they they will be there (CCG) at the end for the BIG 12 madness that may repeat what occurred last season. |
25 |
![]() |
:) |
Teams Ranked:
Rank | Team | Unusualness |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
0.00 |
2 |
![]() |
0.08 |
3 |
![]() |
0.00 |
4 |
![]() |
1.02 |
5 |
![]() |
0.62 |
6 |
![]() |
1.31 |
7 |
![]() |
0.00 |
8 |
![]() |
0.23 |
9 |
![]() |
1.02 |
10 |
![]() |
-0.03 |
11 |
![]() |
0.78 |
12 |
![]() |
0.00 |
13 |
![]() |
0.00 |
14 |
![]() |
0.24 |
15 |
![]() |
0.00 |
16 |
![]() |
0.00 |
17 |
![]() |
0.00 |
18 |
![]() |
-2.34 |
19 |
![]() |
6.01 |
20 |
![]() |
0.00 |
21 |
![]() |
0.00 |
22 |
![]() |
1.66 |
23 |
![]() |
0.00 |
24 |
![]() |
0.00 |
25 |
![]() |
0.00 |
Omissions:
Team | Unusualness |
---|---|
![]() |
0.88 |
![]() |
0.65 |
![]() |
0.43 |
![]() |
0.47 |
Total Score: 17.78