Ballot Type: Human
Submitted: Sept. 14, 2025, 4:28 p.m.
Overall Rationale: Strength of wins, player performance/explosiveness, reputation/coaching, statistical extremes (incredible offense/defense)
Rank | Team | Reason |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
Outstanding reputation and have yet to falter, no justifiable reason to move them down |
2 |
![]() |
Worrying offense yet defense appears strong enough to win nonetheless, strong wins against Clemson and Florida where defense truly made a statement |
3 |
![]() |
Week one statement against Notre Dame and explosive beatdown on newly-ranked USF, experienced quarterback and good overall production so far |
4 |
![]() |
Elite reputation and strong offensive showing against Tennessee to remain undefeated, close call in overtime but better wins than Penn State |
5 |
![]() |
Lack of quality wins so far, strong performances but cannot justify placing above the top 4 teams listed |
6 |
![]() |
Similar situation to Penn State |
7 |
![]() |
Best player in CFB (my opinion, John Mateer), strong win against Michigan and progressing offense against other teams |
8 |
![]() |
Strong performance against Alabama week one, good offensive explosiveness in their second game |
9 |
![]() |
Strong offensive showing against Notre Dame, offensive consistency against rest of opponents |
10 |
![]() |
Strong quarterback in Luke Altmyer, similar situation to Penn State and Oregon |
11 |
![]() |
Good performance through four games, Rocco Becht is an excellent player and has pushed them to a 4-0 record |
12 |
![]() |
Worrying performance against UTEP after week one loss to Ohio State, strong reputation and experience is keeping them alive |
13 |
![]() |
Performed well against Arkansas and kentucky, strong offensive performances similar to that of last year's team |
14 |
![]() |
Close loss to Georgia in overtime, powerful offensive showcases otherwise and tenured quarterback in Joey Aguilar with explosive offensive weapons |
15 |
![]() |
Off to a hot start with wins over Colorado and Clemson, explosive players at RB and QB |
16 |
![]() |
Heisman candidate (Fernando Mendoza) leading undefeated push, powerful offensive performances against weak opponents |
17 |
![]() |
Loss to FSU week one is still dragging them down, but a bounceback appears to have occurred over the past two weeks |
18 |
![]() |
Strong performances against weak opponents, first test next week |
19 |
![]() |
Same situation as Texas Tech with slightly less offensive showcasing |
20 |
![]() |
Strong performance against Sellers and UofSC following two relatively strong offensive performances |
21 |
![]() |
Underwood appears to be developing quickly, Oklahoma loss slightly dragging them down |
22 |
![]() |
Incredibly strong offensive with many explosive weapons including QB1, WR1, and of course RB1 |
23 |
![]() |
Second strongest offense so far behind Texas Tech, some friction against Purdue but enough to pull them into 23rd |
24 |
![]() |
Best defense in college football so far but yet to face a true test |
25 |
![]() |
Strong wins with explosive offensive weapons such as their RB1 |
Teams Ranked:
Rank | Team | Unusualness |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
0.00 |
2 |
![]() |
0.40 |
3 |
![]() |
0.00 |
4 |
![]() |
0.00 |
5 |
![]() |
0.00 |
6 |
![]() |
0.00 |
7 |
![]() |
0.00 |
8 |
![]() |
0.00 |
9 |
![]() |
0.00 |
10 |
![]() |
0.00 |
11 |
![]() |
0.00 |
12 |
![]() |
0.00 |
13 |
![]() |
0.00 |
14 |
![]() |
0.19 |
15 |
![]() |
0.00 |
16 |
![]() |
0.00 |
17 |
![]() |
0.00 |
18 |
![]() |
0.00 |
19 |
![]() |
0.00 |
20 |
![]() |
0.00 |
21 |
![]() |
0.02 |
22 |
![]() |
2.93 |
23 |
![]() |
0.00 |
24 |
![]() |
0.00 |
25 |
![]() |
0.01 |