Ballot Type: Human
Submitted: Sept. 8, 2025, 1:25 p.m.
Overall Rationale: Combination. Primarily wins, eye test, roster comp. Also reference AP&Coaches Polls. This early on teams with losses will not be high.
Rank | Team | Reason |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
(-) [70-0] Taking care of business |
2 |
![]() |
(-) [34-0] Taking care of business. Could be anywhere 2-5. |
3 |
![]() |
(+3) [69-3] Dominated a P4 opponent. Could be anywhere 2-5. |
4 |
![]() |
(+1) [45-3] Taking care of business. Could be anywhere 2-5. |
5 |
![]() |
(-1) [28-6] Should've won more convincing. |
6 |
![]() |
(-2) [23-7] Should've won more convincing. Clemson win also seems less impressive now. |
7 |
![]() |
(+5) [77-3] Continue to impress. Seeming like 24 was the fluke not 23. Castellanos early heisman contender. |
8 |
![]() |
(+13) [24-13] Convincing win against a top talent comp roster. Wasn't as close as the score indicated. Mateer early heisman contender. |
9 |
![]() |
(+2) [16-13] Rivalry win. 3-0 P4 team. |
10 |
![]() |
(NR) [45-19] I did not have any preseason hype or expectations for them, but continue to look very strong. |
11 |
![]() |
(+11) [72-17] P4 Win W1 + Dominating performance this week. |
12 |
![]() |
(+5) [63-9] P4 Win W1 + Dominating performance this week. |
13 |
![]() |
(NR) [18-16]. 2 Ranked wins, could honestly argue they should be higher. |
14 |
![]() |
(+6) [62-14]. 2 games over 60 points scored and only 1/2 points allowed. Haven't played a P4 team yet though. |
15 |
![]() |
(+8) [56-9]. Dominating win, no strong opponents yet. |
16 |
![]() |
(-) [30-23]. SEC win but close, against a supposedly bottom team. |
17 |
![]() |
(+8) [27-3]. Dominating win W1, P4 win W2. Appear to have found their guy to replace BYJew. |
18 |
![]() |
(-3) [38-10]. Passed by teams I found more impressive. |
19 |
![]() |
(NR) [59-20]. Two strong wins, people seem to have forgotten about them. |
20 |
![]() |
(NR) [42-31] P4 Rivalry Ranked Win. (I had KU ranked). |
21 |
![]() |
(-14) [38-7]. Hard to put a 1-1 team above teams with 2 or 3 wins. Roster still looks strong, Arch just looks alright. |
22 |
![]() |
(-3) [73-0]. What they should do. Still has one of the best roster comps. |
23 |
![]() |
(-15) [27-16]. Stuggled at home against a weak opponent. Fraud alert? Is LSU not as good as we thought either? |
24 |
![]() |
(-6). Just looking alright relative to the roster strength difference in their 2 games. |
25 |
![]() |
(-16) [BYE]. 0-1, only on this board solely for roster comp and being in the natty last year. An 0-1 team probably shouldnt't be ranked when there is 2-0 teams out there. FELL OUT: Arizona State, Kansas, Florida, Michigan |
Teams Ranked:
Rank | Team | Unusualness |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
0.00 |
2 |
![]() |
0.00 |
3 |
![]() |
0.00 |
4 |
![]() |
0.00 |
5 |
![]() |
0.00 |
6 |
![]() |
0.00 |
7 |
![]() |
0.00 |
8 |
![]() |
0.27 |
9 |
![]() |
0.00 |
10 |
![]() |
0.00 |
11 |
![]() |
0.00 |
12 |
![]() |
0.70 |
13 |
![]() |
0.00 |
14 |
![]() |
0.70 |
15 |
![]() |
0.08 |
16 |
![]() |
0.00 |
17 |
![]() |
0.81 |
18 |
![]() |
-0.18 |
19 |
![]() |
0.49 |
20 |
![]() |
0.00 |
21 |
![]() |
-0.66 |
22 |
![]() |
0.00 |
23 |
![]() |
-0.09 |
24 |
![]() |
-0.18 |
25 |
![]() |
-1.07 |
Omissions:
Team | Unusualness |
---|---|
![]() |
0.08 |
![]() |
0.13 |
![]() |
0.03 |
Total Score: 5.47