Ballot Type: Computer
Submitted: Sept. 7, 2025, 9:51 a.m.
Overall Rationale: Wins and losses are weighted by the difference in "rank" between the winner/loser and the median team. Scaled such that beating strong teams matters more than beating weak teams, and losing to bad teams is worse than losing to strong teams. Winning is weighted slightly more than losing, and by the preceding two years' performance. Results are scaled by offensive and defensive points per drive efficiencies, and strength of schedule determined by opponents score normalized throughout the season. Preseason rankings are weighted by returning production, talent composite, and previous season(s)' success. Teams ranked #8-#22 are really tight (<0.5 standard deviation), so lots of shuffling and "big" moves in the ranking which is common for the early season. Next five out: Missouri, Pitt, Tulane, UNLV, NC State.
Rank | Team | Reason |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
(+3) Merciless... Maybe Oregon's really good, maybe OK State is really bad, either way that was a beat down. |
2 |
![]() |
(+0) Smothered FIU. Penn State looks as good as billed, but has yet to face a challenge. |
3 |
![]() |
(-2) Pasted Grambling, but drop a bit due to more impactful wins. |
4 |
![]() |
(-1) A bit closer than you would like against Austin Peay, but never in doubt. |
5 |
![]() |
(+0) Similar to Georgia, LSU struggled more than you would like against Louisiana Tech... |
6 |
![]() |
(+2) Dicey win against Kentucky, but always good to start the early season with a conference win. |
7 |
![]() |
(+7) Big win for the Aggies over the Aggies. Cruised through the second half. |
8 |
![]() |
(+1) USC's offense looks impressive. Probably a bittersweet return to the Coliseum for Clay Helton. |
9 |
![]() |
(+10) The Hoosiers put the hurt on Kennesaw. They see a big jump due to how efficiency they were on both offense and defense. |
10 |
![]() |
(+6) Smothered Stanford, who is certainly far from a good team, but still good work by BYU. |
11 |
![]() |
(-1) Solid bounce-back win for the Longhorns, but they might have serious problems along the offensive line against more athletic teams. |
12 |
![]() |
(-6) Good win over Bethune, the Hurricanes drop due to very tight packing of teams in the second tier. |
13 |
![]() |
(+9) Won the turnover battle 5-0 against Duke. Solid win over what should be a good Duke team. |
14 |
![]() |
(-7) Slow start against in state FCS opponent SC State, but dominated the middle frames to put the game out of reach. Would have liked to see the Cocks start faster. |
15 |
![]() |
(-4) On BYE this week. huge game against Texas A&M next. |
16 |
![]() |
(+18) Holy crap, Alex Golesh has this USF team on fire! Two ranked wins to start the year with a massive victory AT Florida! |
17 |
![]() |
(-6) Crushed East Tennessee State as expected. Drop due to more impressive performances by teams around them. |
18 |
![]() |
(-1) Beat up on Kent State. Hard to take anything meaningful from this, but nice to see Tech crushing lesser teams. |
19 |
![]() |
(+1) That early win over KState in Dublin is looking less impressive every week, but great win this week over Iowa and an El Assico victory for the Cyclones. |
20 |
![]() |
(+12) Welp, hopefully Akron gets home safely cause that was ugly. Well done Cornhuskers! |
21 |
![]() |
(+10) Great win for the Sooners over Michigan! Defense looked legit and Mateer showed how dynamic of a player he can be. |
22 |
![]() |
(+11) Smoked East Texas A&M. Can Florida State really be back after going 13-1, then 2-10? |
23 |
![]() |
(+2) Great win for the Cardinals against JMU. |
24 |
![]() |
(+3) Great start to the year for Georgia Tech. Massive game against Clemson next week. |
25 |
![]() |
(-2) Clemson sneaks into these rankings barely ahead of Mizzou. Struggled with Troy for a while before pulling away. |
Teams Ranked:
Rank | Team | Unusualness |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
0.31 |
2 |
![]() |
0.00 |
3 |
![]() |
0.00 |
4 |
![]() |
0.09 |
5 |
![]() |
0.00 |
6 |
![]() |
1.15 |
7 |
![]() |
1.76 |
8 |
![]() |
3.58 |
9 |
![]() |
1.22 |
10 |
![]() |
2.67 |
11 |
![]() |
0.00 |
12 |
![]() |
-0.61 |
13 |
![]() |
0.00 |
14 |
![]() |
0.00 |
15 |
![]() |
0.00 |
16 |
![]() |
0.00 |
17 |
![]() |
0.00 |
18 |
![]() |
0.00 |
19 |
![]() |
-0.53 |
20 |
![]() |
1.86 |
21 |
![]() |
-0.98 |
22 |
![]() |
-1.24 |
23 |
![]() |
0.00 |
24 |
![]() |
0.00 |
25 |
![]() |
-0.48 |
Omissions:
Team | Unusualness |
---|---|
![]() |
0.75 |
![]() |
0.18 |
![]() |
0.08 |
![]() |
0.03 |
Total Score: 17.52