Ballot Type: Human
Submitted: Nov. 3, 2024, 7:41 a.m.
Overall Rationale: Strength of performance vs strength of opponent
Rank | Team | Reason |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
|
2 |
![]() |
This team wasn’t even that good, but still won on the road. Both offense and defense has some holes, but they’re talented |
3 |
![]() |
Started slow but recovered |
4 |
![]() |
|
5 |
![]() |
This team is not that good and will be exposed eventually |
6 |
![]() |
|
7 |
![]() |
|
8 |
![]() |
|
9 |
![]() |
|
10 |
![]() |
Idk man. Defense was good at times and bad at times. Offense was bad most of the time. Tough to beat a team and the refs though |
11 |
![]() |
This was bad Clemson again |
12 |
![]() |
|
13 |
![]() |
|
14 |
![]() |
|
15 |
![]() |
|
16 |
![]() |
Hmm, playing shaky football finally caught up |
17 |
![]() |
Edit: they did not figure it out |
18 |
![]() |
I can’t tell if smu is good or if Pitt is bad. I still have visions of the Duke game in my head so I can’t move them higher yet |
19 |
![]() |
|
20 |
![]() |
|
21 |
![]() |
|
22 |
![]() |
I believe in vandy! |
23 |
![]() |
|
24 |
![]() |
|
25 |
![]() |
Teams Ranked:
Rank | Team | Unusualness |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
0.00 |
2 |
![]() |
0.17 |
3 |
![]() |
0.00 |
4 |
![]() |
0.26 |
5 |
![]() |
0.00 |
6 |
![]() |
0.28 |
7 |
![]() |
0.00 |
8 |
![]() |
0.00 |
9 |
![]() |
-0.59 |
10 |
![]() |
0.00 |
11 |
![]() |
2.07 |
12 |
![]() |
0.00 |
13 |
![]() |
0.20 |
14 |
![]() |
0.00 |
15 |
![]() |
0.00 |
16 |
![]() |
0.00 |
17 |
![]() |
0.00 |
18 |
![]() |
-1.33 |
19 |
![]() |
0.00 |
20 |
![]() |
0.02 |
21 |
![]() |
0.00 |
22 |
![]() |
0.72 |
23 |
![]() |
0.00 |
24 |
![]() |
1.18 |
25 |
![]() |
0.00 |