Ballot Type: Hybrid
Submitted: Oct. 27, 2024, 9:08 a.m.
Overall Rationale: Week 10 notes: Deservedness keeping highly-rated 2-loss teams such as Illinois and LSU behind 0-loss Army; UNLV can be ranked over due to loss allowance. General notes: FIRST layer (computer portion): SP+, opponents’ SP+, opponents’ opponents’ SP+, opponents’ win %, opponents’ opponents’ win %. SECOND layer (human portion): home/field/away, key injuries, P5/G5 status, watched game factors (ex: offensive/defensive line domination, rush yards after contact, average point of first contact, defensive penetration on non-inside screens, missed tackles, quarterback throwing release speed, overall turnovers, average starting field position, etc). THIRD layer (human portion): wins/losses vs higher-/lower-/non-ranked teams, recency of those results. FOURTH layer (computer portion): Deservedness = Team A cannot be ranked over Team B that has 2+ fewer losses (ex: 9-3 LSU can be ranked over 10-2 Missouri, but 9-3 LSU cannot be ranked over 11-1 Tulane even if LSU beat Tulane heads up, rankings have LSU over Tulane, and/or I think LSU is better than Tulane) unless Team B is giving a X loss allowance to Team A due to significantly fewer P4 games played. Loss allowances come into play when: P5 teams play 2 fewer P5 games than another P5 team (ex: 9-3 Arizona plays 10 P5 games, 11-1 Syracuse plays 8 P5 games, 10-8=2, 9-3 Arizona can be ranked over 11-1 Syracuse); P5 teams play 6 fewer P5 games than a G5 team (11-1 Syracuse plays 8 P5 teams, 9-3 Charlotte plays 2 P5 teams, 8-2=6, 9-3 Charlotte can be ranked over 11-1 Syracuse); G5 teams play 10 fewer P5 teams than a P5 team (ex: 9-3 Arizona plays 10 P5 games, 11-1 Liberty plays 0 P5 games, 10-0=0, 9-3 Arizona can be ranked over 11-1 Liberty); or G5 teams play 2 fewer P5 games than another G5 team (ex: 9-3 Charlotte plays 2 P5 games, 11-1 Liberty plays 0 P5 games, 2-0=2, 9-3 Charlotte can be ranked over 11-1 Liberty). If the game differential exceeds more than 2/6/10/2 in those scenarios, add another loss allowance for each additional P5 game played difference in that scenario.
| Rank | Team | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Oregon Ducks
|
+0. Would be the #1 playoff seed in this scenario, playing the winner of #8 Indiana/#9 Tennessee in the Rose Bowl |
| 2 |
Ohio State Buckeyes
|
+0. Would be the #5 playoff seed in this scenario, hosting #12 Boise State in the first round |
| 3 |
Penn State Nittany Lions
|
+0. Would be the #5 playoff seed in this scenario, hosting #11 Notre Dame in the first round |
| 4 |
Miami Hurricanes
|
+0. Would be the #2 playoff seed in this scenario, playing the winner of #7 Texas/#10 Clemson in the Peach Bowl |
| 5 |
Georgia Bulldogs
|
+0. Would be the #3 playoff seed in this scenario, playing the winner of #6 Penn State/#11 Notre Dame in the Sugar Bowl |
| 6 |
Texas Longhorns
|
+0. Would be the #7 playoff seed in this scenario, hosting #10 Clemson in the first round |
| 7 |
Indiana Hoosiers
|
+2. Would be the #8 playoff seed in this scenario, hosting #9 Clemson in the first round |
| 8 |
Tennessee Volunteers
|
+0. Would be the #9 playoff seed in this scenario, playing at #8 Indiana in the first round |
| 9 |
BYU Cougars
|
+1. Would be the #4 playoff seed in this scenario, playing the winner of #5 Ohio State/#12 Boise State in the Fiesta Bowl |
| 10 |
Clemson Tigers
|
+1. Would be the #10 playoff seed in this scenario, playing at #7 Texas in the first round |
| 11 |
Notre Dame Fighting Irish
|
+1. Would be the #11 playoff seed in this scenario, playing at #6 Penn State in the first round |
| 12 |
Texas A&M Aggies
|
+2 |
| 13 |
Iowa State Cyclones
|
+0 |
| 14 |
Kansas State Wildcats
|
+1 |
| 15 |
SMU Mustangs
|
+2 |
| 16 |
Pittsburgh Panthers
|
+3 |
| 17 |
Boise State Broncos
|
+3. Would be the #12 playoff seed in this scenario, playing at #6 Ohio State in the first round. Deservedness blocking highly-rated 2-loss teams with no loss allowances over Army such as Illinois from being ranked ahead of Army |
| 18 |
UNLV Rebels
|
+4. Loss allowance over Army due to grandfathered P5/G5 schedule. Even though they lost, still have them rated over Washington State |
| 19 |
Washington State Cougars
|
+4. Deservedness blocking highly-rated 2-loss teams with no loss allowances over Army such as Illinois from being ranked ahead of Army |
| 20 |
Navy Midshipmen
|
+4. Deservedness blocking highly-rated 2-loss teams with no loss allowances over Army such as Illinois from being ranked ahead of Army. Even though they lost, still have them rated over Army |
| 21 |
Army West Point
|
NEW. Lowest-rated 0-loss team |
| 22 |
Illinois Fighting Illini
|
-6. Deservedness blocking them from being ranked higher |
| 23 |
LSU Tigers
|
-16. Deservedness blocking them from being ranked higher |
| 24 |
Alabama Crimson Tide
|
NEW. Deservedness blocking them from being ranked higher |
| 25 |
Colorado Buffaloes
|
NEW. Deservedness blocking them from being ranked higher. Next 18: Ole Miss, Missouri, Syracuse, Florida (loss allowance over Louisiana & Memphis), TCU (same), Duke, Tulane, Arizona State, Louisiana, ULM, JMU, WKU, Memphis, Nebraska (loss allowance over Liberty), Vanderbilt (same), Wisconsin (same), Texas Tech (same), Cincinnati (same) |
Teams Ranked:
| Rank | Team | Unusualness |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Oregon Ducks
|
0.00 |
| 2 |
Ohio State Buckeyes
|
0.47 |
| 3 |
Penn State Nittany Lions
|
0.00 |
| 4 |
Miami Hurricanes
|
0.00 |
| 5 |
Georgia Bulldogs
|
0.00 |
| 6 |
Texas Longhorns
|
0.00 |
| 7 |
Indiana Hoosiers
|
0.00 |
| 8 |
Tennessee Volunteers
|
0.00 |
| 9 |
BYU Cougars
|
0.00 |
| 10 |
Clemson Tigers
|
0.00 |
| 11 |
Notre Dame Fighting Irish
|
0.00 |
| 12 |
Texas A&M Aggies
|
0.00 |
| 13 |
Iowa State Cyclones
|
-0.42 |
| 14 |
Kansas State Wildcats
|
0.00 |
| 15 |
SMU Mustangs
|
0.19 |
| 16 |
Pittsburgh Panthers
|
0.00 |
| 17 |
Boise State Broncos
|
0.00 |
| 18 |
UNLV Rebels
|
7.13 |
| 19 |
Washington State Cougars
|
0.17 |
| 20 |
Navy Midshipmen
|
4.10 |
| 21 |
Army West Point
|
0.00 |
| 22 |
Illinois Fighting Illini
|
0.00 |
| 23 |
LSU Tigers
|
-0.55 |
| 24 |
Alabama Crimson Tide
|
-1.27 |
| 25 |
Colorado Buffaloes
|
-0.13 |