Ballot Type: Human
Submitted: Sept. 30, 2024, 4:09 p.m.
Overall Rationale: The teams that look best get ranked higher. No automatic bump for close wins as some team had to win that (looking at you Bama)
Rank | Team | Reason |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
Still unchallenged |
2 |
![]() |
Unchallenged and not really tested |
3 |
![]() |
Good win. Would be #1 if that first quarter applied to the whole game. |
4 |
![]() |
|
5 |
![]() |
Shutdown a solid man-ball team |
6 |
![]() |
|
7 |
![]() |
Highest 1-loss team. Heck of a comeback. |
8 |
![]() |
Controversial win against a mid team. |
9 |
![]() |
What did UCLA do to Oregon... other than destroy the PAC? |
10 |
![]() |
|
11 |
![]() |
|
12 |
![]() |
When on, great. When against Michigan, bad. |
13 |
![]() |
|
14 |
![]() |
|
15 |
![]() |
|
16 |
![]() |
11Windiana is back again |
17 |
![]() |
We are all Dukes now |
18 |
![]() |
|
19 |
![]() |
|
20 |
![]() |
|
21 |
![]() |
|
22 |
![]() |
|
23 |
![]() |
How did this team get slapped by northern illinois |
24 |
![]() |
|
25 |
![]() |
QB? Haha. |
Teams Ranked:
Rank | Team | Unusualness |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
0.15 |
2 |
![]() |
0.00 |
3 |
![]() |
-0.31 |
4 |
![]() |
0.00 |
5 |
![]() |
0.09 |
6 |
![]() |
0.28 |
7 |
![]() |
0.00 |
8 |
![]() |
0.00 |
9 |
![]() |
-0.23 |
10 |
![]() |
0.00 |
11 |
![]() |
0.05 |
12 |
![]() |
0.00 |
13 |
![]() |
0.24 |
14 |
![]() |
1.43 |
15 |
![]() |
0.68 |
16 |
![]() |
0.00 |
17 |
![]() |
1.55 |
18 |
![]() |
0.00 |
19 |
![]() |
0.00 |
20 |
![]() |
-0.64 |
21 |
![]() |
0.00 |
22 |
![]() |
2.37 |
23 |
![]() |
-0.54 |
24 |
![]() |
0.00 |
25 |
![]() |
0.00 |