Ballot Type: Hybrid
Submitted: Sept. 16, 2024, 11:16 a.m.
Overall Rationale: Based on my FPI-like predictive model. Because the predictive model doesn't account for how deserving a team is (hello, #5 Notre Dame), I adjust it with the following rules: * Undefeated teams are maintained in the relative order of the model * Teams with losses can be moved down, but not up, depending on their strength of record and the quality of their wins and losses * A team with fewer losses than another cannot be shifted below them in this process: if a team with more losses has a higher final ranking in this, that means that the computer favored them
Rank | Team | Reason |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
|
2 |
![]() |
|
3 |
![]() |
|
4 |
![]() |
|
5 |
![]() |
|
6 |
![]() |
|
7 |
![]() |
|
8 |
![]() |
|
9 |
![]() |
|
10 |
![]() |
|
11 |
![]() |
|
12 |
![]() |
|
13 |
![]() |
|
14 |
![]() |
|
15 |
![]() |
|
16 |
![]() |
|
17 |
![]() |
|
18 |
![]() |
I don't know why they're here either, my model loves them and I can't explain it. |
19 |
![]() |
|
20 |
![]() |
|
21 |
![]() |
|
22 |
![]() |
|
23 |
![]() |
|
24 |
![]() |
|
25 |
![]() |
Teams Ranked:
Rank | Team | Unusualness |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
0.00 |
2 |
![]() |
0.39 |
3 |
![]() |
0.00 |
4 |
![]() |
0.00 |
5 |
![]() |
0.46 |
6 |
![]() |
0.00 |
7 |
![]() |
0.26 |
8 |
![]() |
1.25 |
9 |
![]() |
0.43 |
10 |
![]() |
0.00 |
11 |
![]() |
0.00 |
12 |
![]() |
1.72 |
13 |
![]() |
1.43 |
14 |
![]() |
-0.22 |
15 |
![]() |
-0.46 |
16 |
![]() |
0.61 |
17 |
![]() |
0.87 |
18 |
![]() |
7.19 |
19 |
![]() |
0.00 |
20 |
![]() |
0.00 |
21 |
![]() |
-1.53 |
22 |
![]() |
0.00 |
23 |
![]() |
-0.05 |
24 |
![]() |
0.70 |
25 |
![]() |
0.14 |
Omissions:
Team | Unusualness |
---|---|
![]() |
2.57 |
![]() |
0.18 |
![]() |
0.04 |
Total Score: 20.47