Ballot Type: Human
Submitted: Sept. 15, 2024, 1:37 p.m.
Rank | Team | Reason |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
They’d be #2 if Quinn Ewers was healthy (not a shot at Arch, just hard for talent to offset talent—even if it’s less talent—plus experience). As for UGA, I know it’s a rivalry but it was hard to justify keeping them at #1 until I remembered the defensive line injuries and the win over Clemson. |
2 |
![]() |
Certainly looked the part. Would be #1 if Ewers was healthy. Interested to see if their performance against Michigan last week carries over when they play tougher opponents (that is, I’m not sure if Michigan is bad). |
3 |
![]() |
Bye week. If they look as good as they did in week 2 against Marshall and Michigan State, I’ll really consider moving them up. Can’t want to see what they look like against a real team, too, but that’ll take longer. |
4 |
![]() |
Some say they are still scoring |
5 |
![]() |
Slightly weaker showing but nothing to necessarily ding them for. |
6 |
![]() |
Nice bounce back (or maybe nice initial bounce?) against Wisconsin. But I’m not sure that Wisconsin is any good, tbh. |
7 |
![]() |
lol essentially a bye week. Poor ball state. They deserve credit for not playing down to their opponent and getting a 3rd win. |
8 |
![]() |
Tricky BC! Almost had them. I think it might say more about BC than Mizzou, though. |
9 |
![]() |
Are we awake now? Or is Oregon State just a shell of itself? |
10 |
![]() |
Bye week |
11 |
![]() |
Bye week |
12 |
![]() |
Good to see Rising back |
13 |
![]() |
Answered some questions and *erased* Arizona. |
14 |
![]() |
I am intrigued. |
15 |
![]() |
Bye week?? (Either a bye or a very unmemorable opponent) |
16 |
![]() |
Bye, but to reiterate, I still think they deserve to be here. This is a good offense and a great RB. |
17 |
![]() |
Bye |
18 |
![]() |
They didn’t score as many points as I expected, instead they fought, scratched, and clawed their way to a win. Finding more ways to win is the mark of a good team, imo. |
19 |
![]() |
Who had Memphis ranked last week, btw? Not that I think FSU is any good. |
20 |
![]() |
That offense was really starting to click. Nusmeier (sp?) looked like the real deal in the 2nd half. But was it because South Carolina isn’t great on defense? |
21 |
![]() |
They won the type of game I hope the Big 12 has over and over again this year |
22 |
![]() |
Bye |
23 |
![]() |
It was Tulsa, but they didn’t play down to their opponent |
24 |
![]() |
Showed signs of life in the first half, which is why they’re back in the T25. Defense looks really salty. Offense looks…injured. But will getting the pieces back fix what we’ve been seeing? I need convincing. |
25 |
![]() |
Not a tough opponent but a 3rd win for a potentially pretty solid team. |
Teams Ranked:
Rank | Team | Unusualness |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
0.00 |
2 |
![]() |
0.00 |
3 |
![]() |
0.00 |
4 |
![]() |
0.00 |
5 |
![]() |
0.00 |
6 |
![]() |
0.00 |
7 |
![]() |
0.00 |
8 |
![]() |
0.00 |
9 |
![]() |
0.00 |
10 |
![]() |
0.00 |
11 |
![]() |
0.00 |
12 |
![]() |
0.00 |
13 |
![]() |
0.00 |
14 |
![]() |
0.71 |
15 |
![]() |
0.41 |
16 |
![]() |
8.01 |
17 |
![]() |
0.24 |
18 |
![]() |
1.49 |
19 |
![]() |
1.05 |
20 |
![]() |
0.00 |
21 |
![]() |
0.00 |
22 |
![]() |
0.00 |
23 |
![]() |
-1.69 |
24 |
![]() |
-1.40 |
25 |
![]() |
0.00 |
Omissions:
Team | Unusualness |
---|---|
![]() |
0.43 |
![]() |
0.18 |
![]() |
0.04 |
![]() |
0.27 |
Total Score: 15.92