Ballot Type: Human
Submitted: Sept. 15, 2024, 11:04 a.m.
Overall Rationale: Early season rankings are based largely on expected results versus other ranked teams, and as the season goes leans more heavily on actual resume. By the end of the season, rankings are based entirely on resume. I lean heavily into head to head results and results against common opponents. I also sort teams into 6 tiers based on championship/playoff likelihood. Tier 1: Championship Frontrunners, near lock to make playoffs Tier 2: Championship Contenders with excellent chance of making playoffs Tier 3: Decent possibility to make playoffs, unlikely to compete for championship Tier 4: Outside playoff shot Tier 5: Unlikely to make playoffs but not quite eliminated Tier 6: No shot at playoffs
Rank | Team | Reason |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
Tier 1. Continue to look very impressive. Having two top.tier QBs on your team is a huge luxury. |
2 |
![]() |
Tier 1. Struggles with UK move them down but they're still a great team. |
3 |
![]() |
Tier 1. |
4 |
![]() |
Tier 2. Dominant win over P5 team on road almost moved them into tier 1. |
5 |
![]() |
Tier 2. |
6 |
![]() |
Tier 2. Looked much better against Oregon State. |
7 |
![]() |
Tier 2. Without Cam Rising this team is still good but not top 10. |
8 |
![]() |
Tier 2. |
9 |
![]() |
Tier 2. |
10 |
![]() |
Tier 2. Another blowout of an inferior team. Playing like a contender right now. |
11 |
![]() |
Tier 3. |
12 |
![]() |
Tier 3. Solid win over good BC team |
13 |
![]() |
Tier 3. Great win over Zona moved them up. |
14 |
![]() |
Tier 3. |
15 |
![]() |
Tier 3. |
16 |
![]() |
Tier 4. Tough win against USC on road. Tough loss against USC on the road. Perfectly balanced. |
17 |
![]() |
Tier 4. |
18 |
![]() |
Tier 4. |
19 |
![]() |
Tier 4. Some worrying signs on their offense. |
20 |
![]() |
Tier 4. |
21 |
![]() |
Tier 4. |
22 |
![]() |
Tier 4. Pac 2 gets its first ranking |
23 |
![]() |
Tier 4. Win over KU not looking quite as good. |
24 |
![]() |
Tier 4. |
25 |
![]() |
Tier 4. Nebraska is back. |
Teams Ranked:
Rank | Team | Unusualness |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
0.00 |
2 |
![]() |
0.00 |
3 |
![]() |
0.00 |
4 |
![]() |
0.00 |
5 |
![]() |
0.00 |
6 |
![]() |
0.18 |
7 |
![]() |
0.87 |
8 |
![]() |
0.02 |
9 |
![]() |
0.99 |
10 |
![]() |
0.00 |
11 |
![]() |
0.00 |
12 |
![]() |
-0.30 |
13 |
![]() |
0.00 |
14 |
![]() |
0.00 |
15 |
![]() |
-1.17 |
16 |
![]() |
0.61 |
17 |
![]() |
0.00 |
18 |
![]() |
0.00 |
19 |
![]() |
0.00 |
20 |
![]() |
0.32 |
21 |
![]() |
0.00 |
22 |
![]() |
0.00 |
23 |
![]() |
0.00 |
24 |
![]() |
0.00 |
25 |
![]() |
-0.56 |
Omissions:
Team | Unusualness |
---|---|
![]() |
0.18 |
![]() |
0.27 |
Total Score: 5.46