Ballot Type: Hybrid
Submitted: Dec. 4, 2022, 12:08 p.m.
Overall Rationale: Week 15 notes: Deservedness keeps teams such as North Carolina out when I would have them over some of the teams in this poll. General notes: 1st layer (computer portion): SP+, opponents’ SP+, opponents’ opponents’ SP+, opponents’ win %, opponents’ opponents’ win %. 2nd layer (human portion): home/field/away, key injuries, P5/G5 status, watched game factors (ex: offensive/defensive line domination, rush yards after contact, average point of first contact, defensive penetration on non-inside screens, missed tackles, quarterback throwing release speed, overall turnovers, average starting field position, etc). 3rd layer (human portion): wins/losses vs higher-/lower-/non-ranked teams, recency of those results. 4th layer (computer portion): Deservedness = team cannot be ranked over another team with 2+ fewer losses (ex: 8-4 Texas can be ranked over 9-3 UCLA, but 8-4 Texas cannot be ranked over 11-2 UTSA even if Texas beaten UTSA heads up, rankings have Texas over UTSA, and/or I think Texas is better than UTSA).
Rank | Team | Reason |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
Did nothing to drop from #1 |
2 |
![]() |
Michigan scared its fans, but has been consistently bearing people all year long in the second half |
3 |
![]() |
TCU rose in my poll from 4 to 3 even with a loss because the loss wasn’t that bad - an overtime loss where they dictated the action and lost it rather than the other team won it. It’s not like Kansas State scored a field goal or touchdown and they couldn’t - TCU was aggressive, had the first action, and Kansas State responded accordingly. I feel like in a do-over or if Kansas State had the ball first, TCU would’ve won. Also, Deservedness doesn’t allow 3-loss teams to be ranked above 1-loss teams |
4 |
![]() |
Ohio State is so lucky both TCU and USC lost. I considered placing them at 3 just like the computer and last week’s human portion had them, but we’ve seen that game already. |
5 |
![]() |
Not too many times the #5 team had a non-existent shot at the playoffs and much lower than teams ranked lower than them |
6 |
![]() |
Considered ranking them lower due to Hooker injury |
7 |
![]() |
Why they’re ranked above Clemson and Kansas State: all losses were close road losses, two of which to ranked teams and the other from week 1. Due to Deservedness, they cannot be ranked over 1-loss teams |
8 |
![]() |
Why they’re ranked below Utah: two losses were at home. Yes, one was when their starting quarterback was injured during the game, but it didn’t seem to make a big deal as evidenced by the title game. Due to Deservedness, they cannot be ranked over 1-loss teams |
9 |
![]() |
Why they’re ranked below Utah and Kansas State: while both Notre Dame and South Carolina are quality opponents, both were at home and one was a blowout |
10 |
![]() |
Why they’re ranked below Clemson: Clemson’s schedule slightly harder |
11 |
![]() |
While Alabama’s losses to LSU and Tennessee were tight, they also played close games against other schools they should’ve blown away if they wanted to be ranked higher |
12 |
![]() |
|
13 |
![]() |
|
14 |
![]() |
|
15 |
![]() |
|
16 |
![]() |
|
17 |
![]() |
Rees-Plumlee’s injury was the bigger factor than Tulane themselves. They’re still a solid team, but it was still close even with him not 100% |
18 |
![]() |
|
19 |
![]() |
Had no doubt Troy would win. If they had shut Coastal out, I would’ve bumped them above Cincinnati in the human portion |
20 |
![]() |
I think we would’ve seen South Alabama do the same thing to Coastal Carolina if they were the ones playing for the Sun Belt |
21 |
![]() |
Deservedness keeping the 4-loss teams from being ranked over Cincinnati and some of the other 2- and 3-loss teams |
22 |
![]() |
Would be in the top 15 if not for Deservedness |
23 |
![]() |
LSU shouldn’t be penalized for playing the #1 team close relatively-speaking |
24 |
![]() |
Computer portion was already high for them |
25 |
![]() |
Next five in alphabetical order: Illinois, Minnesota, North Carolina, Ole Miss, South Carolina |
Teams Ranked:
Rank | Team | Unusualness |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
0.00 |
2 |
![]() |
0.00 |
3 |
![]() |
0.00 |
4 |
![]() |
0.00 |
5 |
![]() |
0.78 |
6 |
![]() |
0.00 |
7 |
![]() |
0.00 |
8 |
![]() |
0.00 |
9 |
![]() |
0.00 |
10 |
![]() |
0.00 |
11 |
![]() |
-0.84 |
12 |
![]() |
0.00 |
13 |
![]() |
0.00 |
14 |
![]() |
0.09 |
15 |
![]() |
0.00 |
16 |
![]() |
0.07 |
17 |
![]() |
-0.06 |
18 |
![]() |
6.73 |
19 |
![]() |
0.00 |
20 |
![]() |
2.06 |
21 |
![]() |
0.00 |
22 |
![]() |
0.00 |
23 |
![]() |
-1.07 |
24 |
![]() |
-0.45 |
25 |
![]() |
0.00 |