Ballot Type: Human
Submitted: Nov. 20, 2022, 12:50 p.m.
Overall Rationale: Out: UCF, Duke Close: Troy, South Alabama
Rank | Team | Reason |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
|
2 |
![]() |
I think OSU and Michigan (and TCU) can agree to forget the on-the-field product from this past week. However, we can't just forget the injuries. Both teams have not 100% RB1 *and* RB2s (Corum being the biggest loss for either team if he's not healthy), Smith-Njigba is out, there are at least 3 broken hands on OSU's defense. I have no idea what to think of next week. Although I'd imagine Corum will play, if he's out I can't see Michigan's offense doing enough to take advantage of OSU's secondary and win through the air like Maryland did. A healthy-ish Corum could invalidate the need for a competent passing attack though. I can't see OSU getting any offense on the ground, but Michigan's secondary is highly suspect. I think OSU is a favorite with Corum and a heavy favorite without. |
3 |
![]() |
|
4 |
![]() |
This is basically 2014 FSU 2.0. |
5 |
![]() |
|
6 |
![]() |
I'm probably giving a bit more respect to Clemson than the average poster, but LSU has been really rough the past few weeks, and I'm not willing to put any of the other 2 loss teams above a 1 loss team. |
7 |
![]() |
|
8 |
![]() |
|
9 |
![]() |
|
10 |
![]() |
This is more of a spot based on power rankings rather than resume, but I feel pretty confident that Penn State is a top 10 team, despite a lack of marquee wins. |
11 |
![]() |
Maybe an overreaction? I get that head to head should matter, and Tennessee is behind 2 teams they beat, but those other 2 teams don't have 4 score losses (that could have been far worse) to an unranked/borderline ranked team. Also, I really don't feel confident that they'd win a neutral field rematch against either team, the defense is no better than a wet paper bag. |
12 |
![]() |
|
13 |
![]() |
|
14 |
![]() |
|
15 |
![]() |
|
16 |
![]() |
|
17 |
![]() |
Bad loss to Georgia Tech, but I can't really put them behind any of the other teams on this list by virtue of # of losses or the other teams also having bad losses. |
18 |
![]() |
|
19 |
![]() |
|
20 |
![]() |
|
21 |
![]() |
|
22 |
![]() |
|
23 |
![]() |
|
24 |
![]() |
|
25 |
![]() |
Teams Ranked:
Rank | Team | Unusualness |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
0.00 |
2 |
![]() |
0.00 |
3 |
![]() |
0.00 |
4 |
![]() |
0.00 |
5 |
![]() |
0.00 |
6 |
![]() |
0.00 |
7 |
![]() |
0.00 |
8 |
![]() |
0.28 |
9 |
![]() |
0.00 |
10 |
![]() |
0.00 |
11 |
![]() |
0.00 |
12 |
![]() |
0.00 |
13 |
![]() |
0.00 |
14 |
![]() |
0.00 |
15 |
![]() |
0.00 |
16 |
![]() |
0.00 |
17 |
![]() |
0.00 |
18 |
![]() |
0.00 |
19 |
![]() |
0.00 |
20 |
![]() |
0.00 |
21 |
![]() |
0.00 |
22 |
![]() |
0.00 |
23 |
![]() |
0.00 |
24 |
![]() |
0.79 |
25 |
![]() |
0.00 |
No major omissions.
Total Score: 1.07