Ballot Type: Human
Submitted: Dec. 7, 2020, 9:12 p.m.
Overall Rationale: Warning up front: This is gonna look nothing like my usual ballots. It doesn't really matter anyway, but I've decided to make this a playoff ranking. I don't usually do that but I have lost all rational grounding for my usual "how good are you *really* at football?" quality rankings, so we're gonna do resumes instead.
Rank | Team | Reason |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
Fight me. |
2 |
![]() |
ND and Alabama are the only acceptable teams in the top two. |
3 |
![]() |
Cincinnati's schedule has been the same difficulty as Ohio State's but they've played a full season. |
4 |
![]() |
Top-40 strength of schedule to Ohio State's 72nd. Very, very close resume to TAMU tiebroken by my opinion of Notre Dame. |
5 |
![]() |
Win over Florida quite impressive, Alabama loss not bad. I think the rest of your SEC schedule is mostly bad teams, though. |
6 |
![]() |
Indiana the only game worth mentioning. I think you're top-four but I don't have much evidence to prove it. |
7 |
![]() |
Hasn't really been threatened in any wins so far. A good football team that should go to the Playoff if they win the SEC. |
8 |
![]() |
I think Stanford and UCLA are both good teams, and their wins over Washington and ASU respectively seem to demonstrate that. Probably not playoff good, but definitely good and not strictly being propped up by quality of competition. |
9 |
![]() |
Credit for hanging around with Ohio State, no credit for beating some bad teams. |
10 |
![]() |
I gotta be real, I thought Coastal was gonna get tarred and feathered by BYU. Credit where credit is due. |
11 |
![]() |
This low rank is more about the Big 12 being disappointing than about the loss to Louisiana, which isn't bad at all. |
12 |
![]() |
Quietly humming in "we're a good team!" territory because of the lack of interesting wins. |
13 |
![]() |
Frankly should have lost to ASU, nearly blew what should have been a cakewalk against my Cats, let an okay but not great Utah keep things close, and what looked like a quality performance against Washington State was mostly Wazzu handing SC the ball over and over and saying "please score more." Not playoff good. |
14 |
![]() |
Still super good, not playoff good, and that's okay. |
15 |
![]() |
No detailed comments. Okay wins, bad loss. |
16 |
![]() |
How the hell did you lose to Kansas State *again*? |
17 |
![]() |
No good wins but no bad losses. Resume purgatory. |
18 |
![]() |
Very good football team with losses only to other very good football teams. |
19 |
![]() |
You can't tell me this team wouldn't be better with Taylor Cornelius. |
20 |
![]() |
Solid but unspectacular. |
21 |
![]() |
Solid but unspectacular. |
22 |
![]() |
I'm not a believer and you can't turn me into one. |
23 |
![]() |
I really feel this is too high but this part of the rankings is a muddled mess and I'm guessing here. |
24 |
![]() |
Stanford is pretty good, hence my generous landing spot for the Huskies, but you gotta beat Oregon or I'm not going to float you anymore. |
25 |
![]() |
Good record, one terrible day at the office. |
Teams Ranked:
Rank | Team | Unusualness |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
0.44 |
2 |
![]() |
-0.09 |
3 |
![]() |
0.48 |
4 |
![]() |
0.00 |
5 |
![]() |
0.00 |
6 |
![]() |
-0.35 |
7 |
![]() |
0.00 |
8 |
![]() |
2.08 |
9 |
![]() |
0.00 |
10 |
![]() |
0.00 |
11 |
![]() |
0.00 |
12 |
![]() |
0.00 |
13 |
![]() |
0.03 |
14 |
![]() |
0.00 |
15 |
![]() |
0.00 |
16 |
![]() |
-0.07 |
17 |
![]() |
-0.38 |
18 |
![]() |
0.00 |
19 |
![]() |
3.64 |
20 |
![]() |
0.36 |
21 |
![]() |
-0.46 |
22 |
![]() |
0.00 |
23 |
![]() |
2.06 |
24 |
![]() |
0.94 |
25 |
![]() |
0.00 |
Omissions:
Team | Unusualness |
---|---|
![]() |
1.59 |
![]() |
0.55 |
![]() |
0.33 |
![]() |
0.21 |
Total Score: 14.08