Ballot Type: Hybrid
Submitted: Dec. 2, 2019, 7:43 p.m.
Overall Rationale: My poll is a hybrid. I take the results of a computer poll of my own creation and split the teams into tiers based on where it makes sense to break the values. I then look at just the teams within the tiers and re-rank within them based on my observations and feelings of the teams.Computer poll has a preseason component and a performance-based component. I phase the preseason component out as the season goes along. For this week, the preseason component is down to 2.5% of the overall calculation.
Rank | Team | Reason |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
1/1 in Tier Aa |
2 |
![]() |
1/1 in Tier Ab |
3 |
![]() |
1/1 in Tier Ac |
4 |
![]() |
1/3 in Tier B: Best loss of the group (USC). Better result than Oklahoma against their common opponent (UCLA) |
5 |
![]() |
2/3 in Tier B |
6 |
![]() |
3/3 in Tier B: Loss to South Carolina really hurts them when compared to the teams Utah and Oklahoma (KSU) lost to. |
7 |
![]() |
1/1 in Tier Ca |
8 |
![]() |
1/2 in Tier Cb: Similar quality losses as Alabama has. However, they have beaten 3 teams (Iowa, Michigan, Indiana) that are ranked ahead of Alabama's best win (Texas A&M) according to my computer |
9 |
![]() |
2/2 in Tier Cb |
10 |
![]() |
1/6 in Tier D: Despite losing to Auburn, they've shown enough through the rest of the season that they are the better team. Would likely be favored  in a hypothetical rematch on a neutral field. |
11 |
![]() |
2/6 in Tier D: Own Head-to-head win over Auburn |
12 |
![]() |
3/6 in Tier D |
13 |
![]() |
4/6 in Tier D |
14 |
![]() |
5/6 in Tier D |
15 |
![]() |
6/6 in Tier D |
16 |
![]() |
1/1 in Tier Ea |
17 |
![]() |
1/1 in Tier Eb: Surprised how  close they are to ND after they were blown out by the Irish. |
18 |
![]() |
1/2 in Tier F: They are placed ahead of Iowa, despite losing to them, due to having a better overall record (10-2 vs. 9-3) , a better record against common opponents (6-1 vs. 5-2), and a better average point differential in games involving common opponents (+13.2 Pts/Game vs. +8.7 Pts/Game). |
19 |
![]() |
2/2 in Tier F |
20 |
![]() |
1/5 in Tier G: Same record overall vs. Cincinnati and same record vs. common opponents. However, they get the edge due to having a superior average point differential against common opponents (+10.4 Pts/Game vs. +4.0 Pts/Game) |
21 |
![]() |
2/5 in Tier G: Both losses are to much higher caliber teams than Boise's loss to BYU. Additionally, they had a better result against Marshall, the only common opponent they have. They beat Marshall 52-14 on the road, while Boise St. only beat them 14-7 at home. |
22 |
![]() |
3/5 in Tier G: Better loss than App St. (Georgia Southern) |
23 |
![]() |
4/5 in Tier G |
24 |
![]() |
5/5 in Tier G: Don't even feel they should be ranked, buy my computer loves them. This is as low as my method will allow me to rank them. |
25 |
![]() |
1/2 in Tier H: Gets the final spot over USC by virtue of a superior overall record and better performances against opponents Fresno State and Colorado (Both 2-0, +13 Pts/Game Avg MoV vs. +6 Pts/Game Avg MoV) |
Teams Ranked:
Rank | Team | Unusualness |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
0.00 |
2 |
![]() |
0.00 |
3 |
![]() |
0.00 |
4 |
![]() |
0.09 |
5 |
![]() |
0.00 |
6 |
![]() |
-0.36 |
7 |
![]() |
0.38 |
8 |
![]() |
0.63 |
9 |
![]() |
0.00 |
10 |
![]() |
0.45 |
11 |
![]() |
-0.02 |
12 |
![]() |
-0.70 |
13 |
![]() |
0.49 |
14 |
![]() |
0.00 |
15 |
![]() |
-0.21 |
16 |
![]() |
0.00 |
17 |
![]() |
1.95 |
18 |
![]() |
-0.25 |
19 |
![]() |
0.00 |
20 |
![]() |
2.18 |
21 |
![]() |
0.00 |
22 |
![]() |
-0.47 |
23 |
![]() |
-0.23 |
24 |
![]() |
0.99 |
25 |
![]() |
0.00 |