Ballot Type: Computer
Submitted: Nov. 18, 2019, 9:01 p.m.
Overall Rationale: I took the BROHM methodology from u/factorialite but with a few minor changes. First, this ranking system is pretty bad (though amusingly quite good in some ways, a la finding Clemson/OU/Alabama highly ranked at the end of last year). The way BROHM works is I have assigned P5 teams 150 points to start, G5 teams 100 points, FCS Playoff (last year) teams 75 points and all other FCS teams 50 points. For each game, a team contributes half of its points into the game pool (so if a P5 team starts against another P5 team they each contribute 75 points). Then, they take out points based on their Pythagorean share in that game (PointsFOR^2/(PointsFOR^2+PointsAGAINST^2)). This way, it's possible for a "bad" team to play a "good" team close and ultimately win points despite losing the game. Alternatively, it is possible for a "good" team to win a game and ultimately lose points to a "bad" team by not beating them by enough.
Teams Ranked:
Rank | Team | Unusualness |
---|---|---|
1 | Ohio State Buckeyes | 0.13 |
2 | Clemson Tigers | 0.12 |
3 | Utah Utes | 1.39 |
4 | Georgia Bulldogs | 0.00 |
5 | LSU Tigers | -2.88 |
6 | Alabama Crimson Tide | 0.00 |
7 | Oregon Ducks | 0.00 |
8 | Michigan Wolverines | 1.52 |
9 | Florida Gators | 0.25 |
10 | Washington Huskies | 14.86 |
11 | Penn State Nittany Lions | -0.25 |
12 | Notre Dame Fighting Irish | 0.67 |
13 | Auburn Tigers | 0.56 |
14 | Oklahoma Sooners | -2.66 |
15 | Texas A&M Aggies | 3.99 |
16 | Iowa State Cyclones | 6.14 |
17 | Baylor Bears | -0.87 |
18 | Virginia Tech Hokies | 4.08 |
19 | Oklahoma State Cowboys | 1.57 |
20 | Minnesota Golden Gophers | -2.22 |
21 | Memphis Tigers | -0.72 |
22 | Miami Hurricanes | 3.22 |
23 | Iowa Hawkeyes | -0.56 |
24 | Appalachian State Mountaineers | 0.00 |
25 | Texas Longhorns | 0.14 |
Omissions:
Team | Unusualness |
---|---|
Wisconsin Badgers | 4.07 |
Cincinnati Bearcats | 2.19 |
Boise State Broncos | 1.43 |
SMU Mustangs | 1.25 |
Total Score: 57.73