Ballot Type: Human
Submitted: Dec. 1, 2018, 11:29 p.m.
Overall Rationale: Ah here we go, the one time I can make my voice heard and have it count for a tiny tiny bit. I played around with a grading formula this year that is heavy on strength of schedule and doesn't punish losses too much, but does punish losses of teams you've played so that strength of wins can be accounted for. Taking the final week here before bowls to recognize 10 win teams and conference champs, sorry four loss teams. So if your team won 10 or more games I see you.However, I'm going against that in advocating for UCF. I know the schedule isn't as hard, but when you've completed back to back undefeated prebowl seasons and still don't get the chance to play for a national title then the system is wrong. There is a tangible split between the P5 and G5 and they should play for their own national championship since they're not allowed a seat at the CFP table.
Rank | Team | Reason |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
13-0 Conference champ |
2 |
![]() |
13-0 Conference champ |
3 |
![]() |
12-0 |
4 |
![]() |
12-0 Conference champ. I 100% agree OU and OSU have played tougher schedules, but this is something UCF has proven they deserve so fuck anyone that doesn't have them in the top four. They've done literally all you could ask, including a 17 point comeback in the CCG without their star QB. |
5 |
![]() |
12-1 conference champ, better loss than OSU, also avenged that loss decisively. |
6 |
![]() |
12-1 conference champ. |
7 |
![]() |
Best two loss team IMO. 11-2 division champ |
8 |
![]() |
Followed by them. 10-2 |
9 |
![]() |
10-3 conference champ. Probably too high here though. |
10 |
![]() |
11-2 conference champ. Too high maybe, but I had Boise here last week and they won @Boise. Also keeps me from having a three loss SEC team in the top 10. |
11 |
![]() |
H2H nod over LSU I guess.  |
12 |
![]() |
Meh. |
13 |
![]() |
10-2, not a great schedule which likely keeps them out of the NY6. |
14 |
![]() |
Probably would be playing in the NY6 if they hadn't lost to MSU. |
15 |
![]() |
Bowl season will have to tell me if WVU is actually good or the Big 12 just isn't great. |
16 |
![]() |
9-3 with nice wins over Florida and Miss State, but still lost to Tennessee..by 17 |
17 |
![]() |
Hell of a season for Syracuse still. |
18 |
![]() |
10-3 division champ. |
19 |
![]() |
10-3 conference champ. |
20 |
![]() |
9-2, but with a chance to win their tenth. Also, they're just good this year. |
21 |
![]() |
10-2 solid season but lost the coach. |
22 |
![]() |
10-3 conference champ. |
23 |
![]() |
10-2 solid season |
24 |
![]() |
8-5 but conference champ. |
25 |
![]() |
10-3 division champ and literally just lost to the team above them. |
Teams Ranked:
Rank | Team | Unusualness |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
0.00 |
2 |
![]() |
0.00 |
3 |
![]() |
0.00 |
4 |
![]() |
0.23 |
5 |
![]() |
0.00 |
6 |
![]() |
0.00 |
7 |
![]() |
-0.06 |
8 |
![]() |
0.00 |
9 |
![]() |
0.00 |
10 |
![]() |
1.27 |
11 |
![]() |
0.00 |
12 |
![]() |
0.00 |
13 |
![]() |
0.00 |
14 |
![]() |
0.00 |
15 |
![]() |
0.00 |
16 |
![]() |
0.00 |
17 |
![]() |
0.00 |
18 |
![]() |
0.44 |
19 |
![]() |
1.48 |
20 |
![]() |
0.00 |
21 |
![]() |
0.76 |
22 |
![]() |
2.74 |
23 |
![]() |
0.00 |
24 |
![]() |
1.17 |
25 |
![]() |
0.10 |
Omissions:
Team | Unusualness |
---|---|
![]() |
1.98 |
![]() |
1.44 |
![]() |
0.65 |
![]() |
0.67 |
![]() |
0.10 |
![]() |
0.08 |
Total Score: 13.18