Ballot Type: Computer
Submitted: Dec. 3, 2018, 11:41 p.m.
Overall Rationale: See previous ballots
Rank | Team | Reason |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
9217 |
2 |
![]() |
8377 |
3 |
![]() |
6232 |
4 |
![]() |
6078 |
5 |
![]() |
5929; My computer picked the same top 5 as the CFP, and the numbers show how close a race it was for the 4th spot. |
6 |
![]() |
5878; Where it diverges is on the placement of UCF and Georgia. My computer had UCF right up there with Ohio State contending for that fourth spot. |
7 |
![]() |
5407 |
8 |
![]() |
4255 |
9 |
![]() |
4010; The computer is really high on the MWC as a whole this season. Three teams finished with 3 losses or fewer, so that's probably a big reason. |
10 |
![]() |
4001; Boise also had a good win over Sun Belt contender Troy. Boise and Fresno exchanged wins, with the net effect of boosting each other higher. |
11 |
![]() |
3989 |
12 |
![]() |
3909 |
13 |
![]() |
3503; My computer would have put Kentucky in the Peach Bowl instead of Florida. Because Kentucky beat Florida. In football. |
14 |
![]() |
3460; I was surprised to see Wazzu fall so far after the Apple Cup, and with championship weekend, others passed them by. If I were personally selecting for the NY6 based on my own opinions, Wazzu would be in the Peach bowl instead of Kentucky or Florida - finishing with just two losses is harder than finishing with three, no matter which P5 conference you play in. |
15 |
![]() |
3422 |
16 |
![]() |
3284; #RankAppState |
17 |
![]() |
3277 |
18 |
![]() |
3197 |
19 |
![]() |
3170; My computer is also really high on the SEC, lots of middling teams with few losses. The good record overcomes the bad OOC scheduling, and the "quality" losses to either Bama or Georgia (or both) are less worse than other P5 teams' "quality" losses. |
20 |
![]() |
2760; Giant drop between Florida and Syracuse, but the Orange were undoubtedly second-best in the ACC this year. Nobody else in the conference got so close to beating Clemson. That said, only Clemson and maybe Syracuse are decent teams at all in the ACC. Good thing squeaky-shoes season is coming up. |
21 |
![]() |
2639; Rounding out the MWC at just two losses, Utah State doesn't have the same strength of schedule advantage as Boise and Fresno to boost their rankings another few spots. |
22 |
![]() |
2630; Like the ACC, the AAC suffers from having one great team, approximately one decent team, and a whole lot of not much else. |
23 |
![]() |
2594; Oh look another 4-loss SEC team. Play 9 conference games already dammit. |
24 |
![]() |
2588; Despite the Pac-12 being absolutely miserable this year, they somehow snuck three teams into the rankings. That's more than the XII or ACC can claim. |
25 |
![]() |
2557; Next 15 out: #26 UAB (2539), #27 Purdue (2511), #28 Georgia Southern (2452), #29 Buffalo (2431), #30 Stanford (2427), #31 Mississippi State (2387), #32 Troy (2374), #33 West Virginia (2358), #34 Auburn (2328), #35 NC State (2263), #36 Michigan State (2261), #37 Northwestern (2254), #38 Pittsburgh (2154), #39 Oregon (2119), #40 Iowa State (1985) |
Teams Ranked:
Rank | Team | Unusualness |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
0.00 |
2 |
![]() |
0.00 |
3 |
![]() |
0.00 |
4 |
![]() |
0.00 |
5 |
![]() |
0.00 |
6 |
![]() |
0.00 |
7 |
![]() |
-0.06 |
8 |
![]() |
0.00 |
9 |
![]() |
1.51 |
10 |
![]() |
2.63 |
11 |
![]() |
-1.09 |
12 |
![]() |
0.00 |
13 |
![]() |
0.36 |
14 |
![]() |
-0.01 |
15 |
![]() |
0.00 |
16 |
![]() |
2.72 |
17 |
![]() |
0.46 |
18 |
![]() |
-0.76 |
19 |
![]() |
-0.95 |
20 |
![]() |
0.00 |
21 |
![]() |
0.76 |
22 |
![]() |
0.13 |
23 |
![]() |
0.00 |
24 |
![]() |
-0.79 |
25 |
![]() |
-0.09 |
Omissions:
Team | Unusualness |
---|---|
![]() |
2.44 |
![]() |
0.65 |
![]() |
0.08 |
Total Score: 15.50