Ballot Type: Computer
Submitted: Dec. 4, 2017, 7:58 p.m.
Overall Rationale: I took the BROHM methodology from u/factorialite but with a few minor changes. First, this ranking system is pretty bad (though amusingly quite good in some ways, a la finding Clemson/OU/Alabama highly ranked).The way BROHM works is I have assigned P5 teams 150 points to start, G5 teams 100 points, FCS Playoff (last year) teams 75 points (which they cannot gain or lose but just stay at 75 always) and all other FCS teams 50 points (which again, cannot gain or lose but just stay at 50 points),For each game, a team contributes half of its points into the game pool (so if a P5 team starts against another P5 team they each contribute 75 points). Then, they take out points based on their pythagorean share in that game (PointsFOR^2/(PointsFOR^2+PointsAGAINST^2)). This way, it's possible for a "bad" team to play a "good" team close and ultimately win points despite losing the game. Alternatively, it is possible for a "good" team to win a game and ultimately lose points to a "bad" team by not beating them by enough.UPDATE: Several weeks ago I found a critical error regarding Miami (FL) that was causing it to not garner the points it should have. Due to this I updated the poll methodology to (hopefully) be a less reactive and have less recency-bias.
Rank | Team | Reason |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
Points: 1150 Move: +2 |
2 |
![]() |
Points 792 Move: +6 |
3 |
![]() |
Points: 733 Move: +6 |
4 |
![]() |
Points: 677 Move: +2 |
5 |
![]() |
Points: 629 Move: -3 |
6 |
![]() |
Points: 503 Move: -1 |
7 |
![]() |
Points: 469 Move: +2 |
8 |
![]() |
Points: 427 Move: -7 |
9 |
![]() |
Points 356 Move +1 |
10 |
![]() |
Points: 321 Move: +3 |
11 |
![]() |
Points 318 Move: +4 |
12 |
![]() |
Points: 318 Move: +6 |
13 |
![]() |
Points: 317 Move: +1 |
14 |
![]() |
Points: 309 Move: +7 |
15 |
![]() |
Points: 305 Move: -3 |
16 |
![]() |
Points: 303 Move +1 |
17 |
![]() |
Points: 301 Move: +2 |
18 |
![]() |
Points: 300 Move: -2 |
19 |
![]() |
Points: 297 Move +7 |
20 |
![]() |
Points: 290 Move: +2 |
21 |
![]() |
Points: 285 Move: +3 |
22 |
![]() |
Points: 267 Move: -11 |
23 |
![]() |
Points: 265 Move: +4 |
24 |
![]() |
Points: 254 Move: -4 |
25 |
![]() |
Points: 230 Move: -2 |
Teams Ranked:
Rank | Team | Unusualness |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
0.00 |
2 |
![]() |
0.00 |
3 |
![]() |
0.00 |
4 |
![]() |
0.00 |
5 |
![]() |
0.41 |
6 |
![]() |
1.26 |
7 |
![]() |
-0.06 |
8 |
![]() |
0.00 |
9 |
![]() |
16.18 |
10 |
![]() |
1.69 |
11 |
![]() |
14.09 |
12 |
![]() |
2.18 |
13 |
![]() |
0.00 |
14 |
![]() |
11.18 |
15 |
![]() |
0.00 |
16 |
![]() |
4.61 |
17 |
![]() |
-1.88 |
18 |
![]() |
-3.45 |
19 |
![]() |
5.98 |
20 |
![]() |
0.00 |
21 |
![]() |
4.21 |
22 |
![]() |
-2.65 |
23 |
![]() |
2.24 |
24 |
![]() |
1.15 |
25 |
![]() |
-1.37 |
Omissions:
Team | Unusualness |
---|---|
![]() |
6.90 |
![]() |
2.97 |
![]() |
1.97 |
![]() |
1.29 |
![]() |
1.24 |
![]() |
0.09 |
![]() |
0.14 |
Total Score: 89.22