Ballot Type: Computer
Submitted: Nov. 6, 2017, 9:07 p.m.
Overall Rationale: I took the BROHM methodology from u/factorialite but with a few minor changes. First, this ranking system is pretty bad (though amusingly quite good in some ways, a la finding Clemson/OU/Alabama highly ranked).The way BROHM works is I have assigned P5 teams 150 points to start, G5 teams 100 points, FCS Playoff (last year) teams 75 points (which they cannot gain or lose but just stay at 75 always) and all other FCS teams 50 points (which again, cannot gain or lose but just stay at 50 points),For each game, a team contributes half of its points into the game pool (so if a P5 team starts against another P5 team they each contribute 75 points). Then, they take out points based on their pythagorean share in that game (PointsFOR^2/(PointsFOR^2+PointsAGAINST^2)). This way, it's possible for a "bad" team to play a "good" team close and ultimately win points despite losing the game. Alternatively, it is possible for a "good" team to win a game and ultimately lose points to a "bad" team by not beating them by enough.
Rank | Team | Reason |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
Score: 555 Movement: 0 |
2 |
![]() |
Score: 554 Movement: 0 |
3 |
![]() |
Score: 451 Movement: +5 |
4 |
![]() |
Score: 391 Movement: 0 |
5 |
![]() |
Score: 374 Movement: +2 |
6 |
![]() |
Score: 362 Movement: -1 |
7 |
![]() |
Score: 356 Movement: -1 |
8 |
![]() |
Score: 347 Movement: +2 |
9 |
![]() |
Score: 337 Movement: +24 |
10 |
![]() |
Score: 318 Movement: +9 |
11 |
![]() |
Score: 311 Movement: +4 |
12 |
![]() |
Score: 304 Movement: +17 |
13 |
![]() |
Score: 273 Movement: +4 |
14 |
![]() |
Score: 271 Movement: -11 |
15 |
![]() |
Score: 261 Movement: +7 |
16 |
![]() |
Score: 259 Movement: -5 |
17 |
![]() |
Score: 250 Movement: -3 |
18 |
![]() |
Score: 244 Movement: +55 |
19 |
![]() |
Score: 242 Movement: +7 |
20 |
![]() |
Score: 228 Movement: -7 |
21 |
![]() |
Score: 227 Movement: +4 |
22 |
![]() |
Score: 227 Movement: +64 |
23 |
![]() |
Score: 209 Movement: +11 |
24 |
![]() |
Score: 209 Movement: 15 |
25 |
![]() |
Score: 202 Movement: +45 |
Teams Ranked:
Rank | Team | Unusualness |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
0.00 |
2 |
![]() |
0.00 |
3 |
![]() |
0.00 |
4 |
![]() |
2.36 |
5 |
![]() |
0.00 |
6 |
![]() |
0.50 |
7 |
![]() |
0.00 |
8 |
![]() |
0.00 |
9 |
![]() |
3.83 |
10 |
![]() |
0.69 |
11 |
![]() |
0.10 |
12 |
![]() |
2.53 |
13 |
![]() |
-2.57 |
14 |
![]() |
0.00 |
15 |
![]() |
2.66 |
16 |
![]() |
-0.26 |
17 |
![]() |
-0.26 |
18 |
![]() |
0.00 |
19 |
![]() |
5.71 |
20 |
![]() |
0.00 |
21 |
![]() |
-1.77 |
22 |
![]() |
3.20 |
23 |
![]() |
1.84 |
24 |
![]() |
1.22 |
25 |
![]() |
0.10 |
Omissions:
Team | Unusualness |
---|---|
![]() |
8.89 |
![]() |
2.35 |
![]() |
1.63 |
![]() |
0.99 |
![]() |
0.18 |
Total Score: 43.61