Ballot Type: Human
Submitted: Oct. 30, 2017, 5:29 p.m.
Overall Rationale: On the cusp: Stanford, USF, WVU, USCe, Toledo
Rank | Team | Reason |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
Only given up 26 1st-half points all season.  Opponents don't score until the game is already out of hand. |
2 |
![]() |
A lot closer to #1 than you might think.  Another impressive win combined with a lackluster showing by Bama might change that. |
3 |
![]() |
Should be an undisputed #3, but voters will continue to sleep on ND |
4 |
![]() |
Huge demonstration over a solid Penn State team |
5 |
![]() |
Despite the loss, their wins over Michigan and Northwestern are starting to look better |
6 |
![]() |
Ohio State and Iowa State are the biggest winners this week, and that bodes well for Oklahoma's fortunes |
7 |
![]() |
By the eye test (and resume of wins), the weakest team in the Top 10, but I can't justify dropping them further |
8 |
![]() |
Northwestern's win provides a huge boost in respectability, because this schedule is still Charmin-soft |
9 |
![]() |
Iowa State is still a much better loss than Syracuse |
10 |
![]() |
Despite the good resume of wins, Syracuse was a bad loss |
11 |
![]() |
TCU's loss hurts OSU almost as bad as it hurt themself |
12 |
![]() |
Speaking of Charmin-soft, Miami's best win is...Syracuse?  There are MAC teams with more convincing resumes. |
13 |
![]() |
I overreacted last week.  Washington's defense is stellar, and their offense is serviceable. |
14 |
![]() |
The two losses are bad, but the wins are oh so good |
15 |
![]() |
UCF continues to win with aplomb |
16 |
![]() |
They don't deserve to rise higher just yet, but they'll have chances to redeem themselves |
17 |
![]() |
The win is good, but Washington State and Stanford look weak |
18 |
![]() |
Quietly building a very good resume |
19 |
![]() |
The wins look worse, but the losses are still okay |
20 |
![]() |
Northwestern's not as bad as everyone thinks, but it doesn't help that they got blown out by Duke |
21 |
![]() |
Their losses were to two good teams, but they were total nonfactors in those games, and their only win was against a terrible (at the time) LSU |
22 |
![]() |
Solid win over a shaky team |
23 |
![]() |
Two blowout losses to two moderately talented teams |
24 |
![]() |
The loss to MSU has not aged well |
25 |
![]() |
They have not earned the hype |
Teams Ranked:
Rank | Team | Unusualness |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
0.00 |
2 |
![]() |
0.00 |
3 |
![]() |
0.17 |
4 |
![]() |
0.00 |
5 |
![]() |
0.29 |
6 |
![]() |
0.05 |
7 |
![]() |
1.49 |
8 |
![]() |
-0.16 |
9 |
![]() |
0.09 |
10 |
![]() |
-0.59 |
11 |
![]() |
0.00 |
12 |
![]() |
-0.55 |
13 |
![]() |
0.00 |
14 |
![]() |
0.00 |
15 |
![]() |
0.00 |
16 |
![]() |
0.00 |
17 |
![]() |
0.00 |
18 |
![]() |
0.24 |
19 |
![]() |
0.00 |
20 |
![]() |
0.29 |
21 |
![]() |
0.00 |
22 |
![]() |
0.00 |
23 |
![]() |
0.00 |
24 |
![]() |
0.00 |
25 |
![]() |
-0.37 |