Ballot Type: Human
Submitted: Oct. 29, 2017, 7:29 a.m.
Overall Rationale: Playoff Prediction Mode engaged. The top four is my expected playoff field, in order. Next four are most the likely replacements (mostly in order). Next four after that are longer shot replacements (mostly in order). Spots 8-12 do not necessarily indicate that those teams are "Top 12" in the nation or better than a team below them. Just that if a top four/eight team falls or certian conditions are met, those teams would most likely move into the playoff field. Beyond the top 12 it's a more traditional poll.
Rank | Team | Reason |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
The oncoming storm… |
2 |
![]() |
Until I see different, they are the front-runners in the B1G. And I don't see the PAC or Big 12 putting a team in the top four on merit alone right now. |
3 |
![]() |
I'm as surprised by this as you probably are. But I think their resume got a bump when Georgia met expectations and slaughtered Florida. |
4 |
![]() |
Of all of the ACC contenders, I think that Clemson looks the best. This is despite their loss to Syracuse. If they win the conference, I think they're in. |
5 |
![]() |
The CFP was created to prevent teams from the same conference from playing for the Natty. As good as Georgia is, until and unless they beat Bama I don't think they make it.  Well, unless there's a healthy dose of chaos. |
6 |
![]() |
If any team looks like it will give Ohio State trouble, it is Wisconsin. Penn State still has a shot, but it would require Ohio State to crap the bed I think. |
7 |
![]() |
I like VT's resume over Miami in the Coastal right now. But they play on 11/4. So that will (likely) be sorted next week. |
8 |
![]() |
If the Big 12 is putting anyone in right now it would be Oklahoma. Yeah they lost to Iowa State. But their resume looks better overall. But you could easily convince me to swap them with ISU at 12. |
9 |
![]() |
See above, they need Ohio State and Wisconsin to stumble I think in order to make the playoff. |
10 |
![]() |
This is your G5 representative. They're obviously on their way to NY6. But without some chaos I don't see the G5 cracking the top four this year. Especially with ND playing so well. |
11 |
![]() |
This is your PAC representative I guess. I'm not very impressed by this conference if I'm being honest. Which may be unfair, but I just haven't seen it from them. |
12 |
![]() |
They beat both Oklahoma and TCU. This puts them into this third tier of teams. The rest of their resume is so-so, and with two losses they likley need some chaos or at least the Big 12 Title to even be in the serious discussion. |
13 |
![]() |
|
14 |
![]() |
|
15 |
![]() |
|
16 |
![]() |
|
17 |
![]() |
|
18 |
![]() |
|
19 |
![]() |
|
20 |
![]() |
|
21 |
![]() |
|
22 |
![]() |
|
23 |
![]() |
|
24 |
![]() |
|
25 |
![]() |
Teams Ranked:
Rank | Team | Unusualness |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
0.00 |
2 |
![]() |
0.63 |
3 |
![]() |
0.17 |
4 |
![]() |
0.50 |
5 |
![]() |
-2.35 |
6 |
![]() |
0.00 |
7 |
![]() |
1.49 |
8 |
![]() |
0.00 |
9 |
![]() |
-0.04 |
10 |
![]() |
0.12 |
11 |
![]() |
0.00 |
12 |
![]() |
0.13 |
13 |
![]() |
-0.86 |
14 |
![]() |
0.36 |
15 |
![]() |
0.80 |
16 |
![]() |
-1.41 |
17 |
![]() |
0.00 |
18 |
![]() |
0.24 |
19 |
![]() |
-3.25 |
20 |
![]() |
5.23 |
21 |
![]() |
0.90 |
22 |
![]() |
3.13 |
23 |
![]() |
0.00 |
24 |
![]() |
-0.80 |
25 |
![]() |
0.00 |
Omissions:
Team | Unusualness |
---|---|
![]() |
0.67 |
![]() |
0.53 |
![]() |
0.32 |
![]() |
0.31 |
Total Score: 24.26