Ballot Type: Computer
Submitted: Sept. 26, 2016, 1:08 p.m.
Overall Rationale: Tie breakers:1. Number of losses.2. Wins over ranked opponents.3. Total wins by opponents you've beaten.4. Margin of victory.5. Number of FBS wins.6. Inertia.7. Coin flip.
Rank | Team | Reason |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
Tied with Louisville, but ahead by virtue of tie-breakers. |
2 |
![]() |
Tied with Michigan, but behind by virtue of tie-breakers. |
3 |
![]() |
|
4 |
![]() |
|
5 |
![]() |
Tied with Alabama and Wisconsin, but atop that group by virtue of tie-breakers. |
6 |
![]() |
Tied with Clemson and Wisconsin, but behind Clemson in tie-breakers. Identical resume to Wisconsin and ranked ahead solely by virtue of inertia (was ahead last week). |
7 |
![]() |
Tied with Clemson and Alabama, but behind Clemson in tie-breakers. Identical resume to Alabama and ranked behind solely by virtue of inertia (was behind last week). |
8 |
![]() |
Tied with Washington and Houston, but atop that group by virtue of tie-breakers. |
9 |
![]() |
Tied with Texas A&M and Houston, but in the middle of that group by virtue of tie-breakers. |
10 |
![]() |
Tied with Washington and Texas A&M, but at the bottom of that group by virtue of tie-breakers. |
11 |
![]() |
Tied with Ohio State, but ahead by virtue of tie-breakers. |
12 |
![]() |
Tied with Baylor, but behind by virtue of tie-breakers. |
13 |
![]() |
Tied with Stanford and Florida, but atop that group by virtue of tie-breakers. |
14 |
![]() |
Tied with WMU and Florida, but in the middle of that group by virtue of tie-breakers. |
15 |
![]() |
Tied with WMU and Stanford, but a the bottom of that group by virtue of tie-breakers. |
16 |
![]() |
Tied with Arkansas, but ahead by virtue of tie-breakers. |
17 |
![]() |
Tied with Boise St., but behind by virtue of tie-breakers. |
18 |
![]() |
Tied with Wake Forest and Miami FL. Tie-breakers put Miami at the bottom of this group. ASU ranks ahead of Wake. by virtue of inertia (was ahead oh them last week). |
19 |
![]() |
Tied with Arizona St. and Miami FL. Tie-breakers put Miami at the bottom of this group. Wake falls behind ASU by virtue of inertia (was behind them last week). |
20 |
![]() |
Tied with Arizona St. and Wake Forest, but at the bottom of the group via tie-breakers. |
21 |
![]() |
Tied with Memphis, but ahead by virtue of tie-breakers. |
22 |
![]() |
Tied with Virginia Tech, but behind by virtue of tie-breakers. |
23 |
![]() |
Tied with Troy, but ahead by virtue of tie-breakers. |
24 |
![]() |
Tied with Utah, but behind by virtue of tie-breakers. |
25 |
![]() |
Tied with Florida St., Air Force, Colorado, Maryland, Toledo, and Georgia Tech; atop all these by virtue of tie-breakers. |
Teams Ranked:
Rank | Team | Unusualness |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
1.20 |
2 |
![]() |
0.00 |
3 |
![]() |
1.61 |
4 |
![]() |
2.66 |
5 |
![]() |
0.00 |
6 |
![]() |
-1.82 |
7 |
![]() |
0.00 |
8 |
![]() |
0.00 |
9 |
![]() |
0.00 |
10 |
![]() |
-0.98 |
11 |
![]() |
0.26 |
12 |
![]() |
-2.68 |
13 |
![]() |
2.82 |
14 |
![]() |
-2.13 |
15 |
![]() |
2.60 |
16 |
![]() |
0.67 |
17 |
![]() |
0.47 |
18 |
![]() |
0.39 |
19 |
![]() |
1.34 |
20 |
![]() |
-0.56 |
21 |
![]() |
3.72 |
22 |
![]() |
2.77 |
23 |
![]() |
-0.97 |
24 |
![]() |
1.13 |
25 |
![]() |
0.00 |
Omissions:
Team | Unusualness |
---|---|
![]() |
1.79 |
![]() |
0.87 |
![]() |
0.70 |
![]() |
0.80 |
![]() |
0.37 |
Total Score: 35.31