Ballot Type: Hybrid
Submitted: Sept. 19, 2016, 1:56 p.m.
Overall Rationale: My mid-season model combines 4 polls, my 25% seeded max likelihood Elo poll, an unseed page rank poll, an unseed ELO based mode, and my personal human poll. My personal poll counts for double each computer poll at this time. My early season seeding model will be faded out to a model that includes 3 computer polls that only use data from this season. I may eventually reduce my personal vote influence by adding a 4th poll or remove it entirely with a 5th but that remains to be seen.I have a firm rule in my personal polls, no team with a record under 0.667 can appear in the rankings in the first 6 weeks, after 6 weeks no team with a record under 0.750 can appear.Feel free to ask questions about any human poll results. The computer polls will be understandably strange this early.The human poll always breaks ties. If both teams are outside the top 25 in the human poll, but makes the top 25, the MLE ranking will the tie once it is up and running.  At the present the MLE model breaks the tie in these cases. The table of rankings can be found in the poll thread. I am more than willing to justify any of my human rankings or give any additional details about the computer models functions. Note: NR in the human poll ranking means I did not have them in my top 25.  This is the first week teams with a loss can appear in my human poll.  Also note, I do my human poll before running any of the computer polls or looking at the AP poll, but I do run the advance metrics (though those are sparse this early).  This is to prevent the computer results or AP poll from influencing my ranking, it also prevents me from manipulating the final results with my rankings. (Eg, I didn't move Louisville down to# 4 and Ohio State to #1 to put Ohio State #1 to feed my team ego. Nor Michigan down to #10 to put them below Alabama.)
Rank | Team | Reason |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
Score: 115/125 Human Rank: #2 |
2 |
![]() |
Score: 112/125 Human Rank: #3 |
3 |
![]() |
Score: 101/125 Human Rank: #7 |
4 |
![]() |
Score: 98/125 Human Rank: #1 |
5 |
![]() |
Score: 87/125 Human Rank: #5 |
6 |
![]() |
Score: 83/125 Human Rank: #6 |
7 |
![]() |
Score: 82/125 Human Rank: #4 |
8 |
![]() |
Score: 72/125 Human Rank: #10 |
9 |
![]() |
Score: 72/125 Human Rank: #12 |
10 |
![]() |
Score: 68/125 Human Rank: #13 |
11 |
![]() |
Score: 66/125 Human Rank: #14 |
12 |
![]() |
Score: 55/125 Human Rank: #11 |
13 |
![]() |
Score: 51/125 Human Rank: #9 |
14 |
![]() |
Score: 51/125 Human Rank: #15 |
15 |
![]() |
Score: 47/125 Human Rank: #16 |
16 |
![]() |
Score: 46/125 Human Rank: NR |
17 |
![]() |
Score: 45/125 Human Rank: NR |
18 |
![]() |
Score: 43/125 Human Rank: #19 |
19 |
![]() |
Score: 43/125 Human Rank: NR |
20 |
![]() |
Score: 36/125 Human Rank: #8 |
21 |
![]() |
Score: 28/125 Human Rank: #17 |
22 |
![]() |
Score: 27/125 Human Rank: #20 |
23 |
![]() |
Score: 25/125 Human Rank: #22 |
24 |
![]() |
Score: 20/125 Human Rank: #25 |
25 |
![]() |
Score: 19/125 Human Rank: #21 Next 5 Out: Georgia Tech (Score: 18, Human: NR), Utah(16, 18), Georgia(16,24), Boise(15, NR), Oklahoma(10, NR), Oregon(9, NR) |
Teams Ranked:
Rank | Team | Unusualness |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
0.35 |
2 |
![]() |
0.00 |
3 |
![]() |
0.25 |
4 |
![]() |
-1.73 |
5 |
![]() |
0.00 |
6 |
![]() |
0.95 |
7 |
![]() |
0.00 |
8 |
![]() |
0.92 |
9 |
![]() |
0.00 |
10 |
![]() |
0.00 |
11 |
![]() |
6.72 |
12 |
![]() |
0.48 |
13 |
![]() |
-0.81 |
14 |
![]() |
0.00 |
15 |
![]() |
0.00 |
16 |
![]() |
9.22 |
17 |
![]() |
0.82 |
18 |
![]() |
0.00 |
19 |
![]() |
2.62 |
20 |
![]() |
-1.92 |
21 |
![]() |
0.00 |
22 |
![]() |
-0.28 |
23 |
![]() |
1.10 |
24 |
![]() |
0.79 |
25 |
![]() |
-1.55 |
Omissions:
Team | Unusualness |
---|---|
![]() |
1.46 |
![]() |
0.41 |
![]() |
0.24 |
Total Score: 32.61